{ "schemaVersion": "1.0.0", "sourceAsOf": "2026-07-30", "title": "Glyphd Proof Status", "description": "The public verification surface for deterministic improvements, experimental claims, and benchmark evidence published by Glyphd Labs.", "provenance": { "sourceSite": "https://glyphd.com", "sourceRepository": "https://github.com/bohselecta/glyphd-labs", "sourceCommit": "4b88a0e955db2af9233a34db023406e65178a005", "sourceCommitUrl": "https://github.com/bohselecta/glyphd-labs/commit/4b88a0e955db2af9233a34db023406e65178a005", "proofRepository": "https://github.com/bohselecta/glyphd-proofs", "doctrine": "Publication state is not claim state. Deterministic fixture conformance is not measured performance. No PASS badge without a versioned method, configuration, artifacts, limitations, and receipt." }, "totals": { "publications": 29, "claims": 85, "evidence": 7, "benchmarks": 16, "instruments": 22, "notes": 18 }, "publicationStatusCounts": { "HYPOTHESIS": 1, "IMPLEMENTED": 8, "REPRODUCED": 1, "SPECIFIED": 16, "VERIFIED_MECHANISM": 3 }, "claimStatusCounts": { "AWAITING_LOCAL_RUN": 7, "HYPOTHESIS": 23, "IMPLEMENTED": 10, "INCONCLUSIVE": 1, "REPRODUCED": 2, "SOURCE_REVIEWED": 1, "SPECIFIED": 26, "VERIFIED_MECHANISM": 12 }, "claimVisibilityCounts": { "PUBLIC": 82, "WITHHELD": 3 }, "methodology": { "primaryRule": "No PASS badge without receipts.", "distinctions": [ "A publication state summarizes a paper; each consequential claim keeps its own state.", "Implemented means a mechanism or instrument exists. It does not mean the claimed benefit was measured.", "Deterministic fixture conformance validates the shape of a benchmark contract. It is not a benchmark run.", "A teaching instrument demonstrates a mechanism. It is not experimental evidence.", "Verification returns evidence. Human acceptance remains the final authority." ], "stateDefinitions": { "REPRODUCED": "A versioned run with public method, configuration, artifacts, limitations, and receipt reproduced the stated scope.", "VERIFIED_MECHANISM": "The mechanism or invariant was directly checked; broader outcome or performance claims remain outside scope.", "IMPLEMENTED": "A working public implementation or deterministic instrument exists.", "SOURCE_REVIEWED": "The statement is supported by reviewed primary sources, not a Glyphd experiment.", "SPECIFIED": "The architecture, contract, or test is specified but not yet implemented or run to evidence.", "HYPOTHESIS": "A testable proposition awaiting adequate evidence.", "INCONCLUSIVE": "Available evidence does not settle the claim.", "FAILED": "The declared test or acceptance condition failed.", "AWAITING_LOCAL_RUN": "The test contract exists, but no qualifying local run receipt is public." } }, "researchPrograms": [ { "id": "every-moment-is-a-message", "title": "Every Moment Is a Message", "state": "HYPOTHESIS", "category": "Ambient intelligence", "summary": "A standalone research proposition about treating moments as addressable, contextual messages. It is published as a hypothesis, not an established result.", "relatedBenchmark": null, "url": "https://glyphd.com/research/every-moment-is-a-message" }, { "id": "recursive-tripartite-inference-network", "title": "Recursive Tripartite Inference Network", "state": "SPECIFIED", "claimState": "AWAITING_LOCAL_RUN", "category": "Recursive inference", "summary": "A structural partitioning proposal with the B16 contract in deterministic fixture conformance. No qualifying performance or comparative result is public.", "relatedBenchmark": "b16-rtin-structural-partitioning", "url": "https://glyphd.com/research/recursive-tripartite-inference-network" } ], "publications": [ { "id": "p01-manifestation-gap", "number": "P01", "title": "Generating Language Is Not the Same as Doing What the Language Says", "subtitle": "The manifestation gap and the case for stateful latent objects in general AI assistance", "category": "Foundations", "version": "0.1.0", "date": "2026-07-27", "publicationState": "SPECIFIED", "publicationClass": "public-safe working paper", "abstract": "Language models can describe a plan, simulate the voice of an expert, enumerate the steps of a build, and announce that work is complete without any necessary change occurring in the world that the language describes. This is not a minor product defect. It is a category error created by treating linguistic plausibility as operational progress.\n\nThis paper names that error **the manifestation gap**: the distance between generated language and the observable, persistent, inspectable state that would make the language true. The proposed response is a general architecture in which an intelligent system must manifest a **latent object** alongside its language. The object may be an artifact, a state transition, a decision graph, a simulation, a verified operational surface, a test result, a receipt, a changed file tree, or an explicitly preserved uncertainty. What matters is that it has identity, state, lineage, acceptance conditions, and a visible relationship to the stated goal.\n\nThe central claim is not that every response must create a document or run a tool. It is that every consequential interaction should answer: **what is being manifested, how can its progress be observed, and what would count as truthfully complete?** This reframes the general assistant from a sequence generator into a participant in a shared human world. Language becomes one projection of a governed object rather than the object itself.", "wordCount": 2839, "sectionCount": 17, "claimCount": 3, "diagramCount": 3, "relatedInstruments": [ "d01-truth-plane-lens-plane", "d14-workpage-generator" ], "relatedBenchmarks": [ "b09-workpage-os" ], "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p01-manifestation-gap", "pdfUrl": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p01-manifestation-gap.pdf" }, { "id": "p02-lcsm-backboard", "number": "P02", "title": "LCSM / Backboard", "subtitle": "Durable state, provenance, authority, and inspectable change of mind for AI systems", "category": "Continuity & Canon", "version": "0.1.0", "date": "2026-07-27", "publicationState": "VERIFIED_MECHANISM", "publicationClass": "public-safe working paper", "abstract": "Long-running work with language models fails less often because the model cannot generate text than because the surrounding system cannot preserve what is currently true. Transcripts accumulate proposals, corrections, reversals, sources, and outputs, but they do not reliably distinguish what was said from what was accepted. A later model must reread history and reconstruct state, often blending obsolete instructions with current intent.\n\n**Long-Context State Memory (LCSM)** is a model-agnostic runtime for durable canonical state, provenance, authority, journaled transition, and reconstruction. **Backboard** is the reference workbench that makes the protocol visible. Conversation is intake; bounded notes and canonical objects represent current recognized truth; immutable versions preserve change of mind; proposals are validated and gated before they move a canonical pointer; receipts explain why the current state exists.\n\nThe architecture is summarized by one chain of command:\n\n> **The model proposes. The runtime validates. The policy gate authorizes. The journal records. The canon pointer moves. The user can inspect.**\n\nLCSM is not an attempt to place an infinitely long transcript inside a model. It removes the obligation for the model to own memory. The model receives a scoped working set compiled from authoritative state and relevant evidence. The runtime retains the durable object.", "wordCount": 2373, "sectionCount": 20, "claimCount": 3, "diagramCount": 4, "relatedInstruments": [ "d01-truth-plane-lens-plane" ], "relatedBenchmarks": [ "b01-fovea-correctness-cognition" ], "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p02-lcsm-backboard", "pdfUrl": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p02-lcsm-backboard.pdf" }, { "id": "p03-fovea-address-fabric", "number": "P03", "title": "The Future Is Foveated", "subtitle": "Deterministic addressing, procedural landmarks, and evidence-bound navigation", "category": "Addressing & Retrieval", "version": "0.1.0", "date": "2026-07-27", "publicationState": "VERIFIED_MECHANISM", "publicationClass": "public-safe working paper", "abstract": "Large information systems are typically navigated by names, search results, folders, timelines, and lists. These are effective but force every return to begin as a query or a reconstruction of hierarchy. Human beings also remember by place, neighborhood, landmark, scale, and relative position. FOVEA proposes a deterministic address fabric that gives digital objects stable place, procedurally generated navigational identity, and attention-proportional retrieval without turning the spatial projection into the source of truth.\n\nFOVEA uses an exact dyadic quadkey lattice, Hilbert linearization for locality-preserving storage and traversal, receipt-bound placement, deterministic landmarks, a single `LOOK` observation primitive, and concentric retrieval budgets around an active reticle. Canonical state remains in LCSM. Encoded object representation remains in `fold/2`. FOVEA owns placement, address mathematics, locality, navigation, and bounded retrieval.\n\nThe strongest current claim is infrastructural: the supplied address implementation and proof deck establish coherent exact addressing, traversal, reconstruction, and corruption-handling mechanisms. The central cognitive claim—that procedural landmarks make a recursive information field more memorable and useful than an ordinary grid or competent search interface—remains deliberately falsifiable through named kill criteria.", "wordCount": 2489, "sectionCount": 20, "claimCount": 4, "diagramCount": 4, "relatedInstruments": [ "d02-fovea-address-atlas", "d09-fractal-llm-locality" ], "relatedBenchmarks": [ "b01-fovea-correctness-cognition" ], "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p03-fovea-address-fabric", "pdfUrl": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p03-fovea-address-fabric.pdf" }, { "id": "p04-memory-is-not-the-lens", "number": "P04", "title": "Memory Is Not the Lens", "subtitle": "The LCSM–FOVEA dual-plane architecture for canonical truth and selective context", "category": "Continuity & Canon", "version": "0.1.0", "date": "2026-07-27", "publicationState": "SPECIFIED", "publicationClass": "public-safe working paper", "abstract": "Persistent AI systems need both durable truth and selective context. These requirements are often collapsed into one “memory” subsystem: a vector store, a graph, a spatial map, a long transcript, or a model-managed summary. The collapse is dangerous. The mechanism that decides what is canonical should not be the same mechanism that decides what is nearby, visible, or currently worth loading.\n\nThis paper defines the **LCSM–FOVEA dual-plane architecture**. LCSM is the authority-bearing plane for canonical state, versions, provenance, receipts, disputes, and reconstruction. FOVEA is the disposable optical plane for address, locality, projection, navigation, landmarks, and foveated working sets. An object may be placed, summarized, highlighted, or omitted by the lens without changing what the truth plane recognizes. The entire optical plane can be deleted and reconstructed from the ledger.\n\nThe specific contribution is not event sourcing, quadtrees, or foveated retrieval in isolation. It is their disciplined composition around one asymmetry: **the lens depends on memory; memory never depends on the lens.** This gives AI systems spatial and attention-scaled interfaces without allowing a projection to become a hidden second authority.", "wordCount": 2143, "sectionCount": 21, "claimCount": 3, "diagramCount": 4, "relatedInstruments": [ "d01-truth-plane-lens-plane", "d02-fovea-address-atlas" ], "relatedBenchmarks": [ "b01-fovea-correctness-cognition", "b05-surfacedelta-uplift" ], "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p04-memory-is-not-the-lens", "pdfUrl": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p04-memory-is-not-the-lens.pdf" }, { "id": "p05-glyphcas", "number": "P05", "title": "GlyphCAS", "subtitle": "Exact content, typed semantic identity, and evidence-preserving reuse for language-model systems", "category": "Identity & Reuse", "version": "0.1.0", "date": "2026-07-27", "publicationState": "IMPLEMENTED", "publicationClass": "public-safe working paper", "abstract": "Conventional content-addressable storage is exact by design: identical bytes receive identical content identities; different bytes do not. Language-model systems often want a second property: repeated meanings, structures, plans, or outputs should be reusable even when their surface bytes differ. A naive “semantic hash” can create speed, but it can also erase provenance, collapse task-specific differences, cross project or authority boundaries, and promote approximate similarity into false exactness.\n\n**GlyphCAS** is a layered identity and reuse architecture that keeps exact content identity sovereign while adding typed, contract-bound derived identities. It separates content, semantic, contextual, dependency, representation, logical, and receipt identities. A model may propose a semantic graph or reuse candidate, but deterministic canonicalization, schema validation, authority checks, versioned compilers, and explicit Equivalence Contracts decide whether an alias may be minted or used.\n\nThe reference package implements exact SHA-256 storage, deterministic canonical JSON over a bounded subset, Unicode normalization, content-addressed semantic identities, contextual reuse keys, controlled paraphrase snapping, project and authority isolation, dependency invalidation, hash-chained receipts, `fold/2` representation objects, exact recipe verification, prefix/KV cache keys, deterministic software routing, and ten passing unit tests.\n\nThe current evidence supports a reference architecture and narrow mechanism claims. It does not establish universal semantic canonicalization, universal model-independent cache reuse, production latency gains, or a general-purpose compression result.", "wordCount": 2289, "sectionCount": 21, "claimCount": 4, "diagramCount": 4, "relatedInstruments": [ "d03-glyphcas-identity-explorer", "d07-cas-native-work-order" ], "relatedBenchmarks": [ "b03-glyphcas" ], "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p05-glyphcas", "pdfUrl": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p05-glyphcas.pdf" }, { "id": "p06-actor-before-agent", "number": "P06", "title": "Actor Before Agent", "subtitle": "Persistent identities, temporary inference, and evidence-bound World Patches", "category": "Agents & Simulation", "version": "0.1.0", "date": "2026-07-27", "publicationState": "SPECIFIED", "publicationClass": "public-safe working paper", "abstract": "Most “agent” architectures begin with a running model and ask how to give it memory, personality, tools, and autonomy. That order makes identity dependent on continuous inference and encourages systems to confuse temporary computation with the person, institution, or character being represented.\n\nThe Actor–Agent Runtime reverses the order. An **Actor** is a durable, versioned identity and state capsule that exists when no model is running. An **Agent Process** is a temporary, bounded computation that wakes because the actor is relevant, receives only permitted knowledge, proposes a reaction or plan, and returns a structured World Patch. Deterministic validators check feasibility, knowledge, authority, resource, identity, and policy constraints before any accepted state change increments the actor revision.\n\nThe architecture supports persistent people, organizations, game citizens, social proxies, and institutional actors without pretending that thousands of entities are continuously thinking through an LLM. It enables multiplex inference, bounded autonomy, explainable background plans, local-model substitution, replay, and identity continuity.\n\nThe source model was developed for the game MAIN CHARACTER, but the distinction generalizes to any system in which a durable person-shaped or institution-shaped state must outlive an inference call.", "wordCount": 1821, "sectionCount": 21, "claimCount": 3, "diagramCount": 4, "relatedInstruments": [ "d05-actor-runtime-theater" ], "relatedBenchmarks": [ "b04-actor-agent-runtime" ], "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p06-actor-before-agent", "pdfUrl": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p06-actor-before-agent.pdf" }, { "id": "p07-surfacemind-surfacedelta", "number": "P07", "title": "SurfaceMind and SurfaceDelta", "subtitle": "Verified operational surfaces and bounded graph patches for small and large language models", "category": "Operational Surfaces", "version": "0.1.0", "date": "2026-07-27", "publicationState": "IMPLEMENTED", "publicationClass": "public-safe working paper", "abstract": "Language models are often asked to produce complete answers, pages, reports, dashboards, or interfaces in one generation. This gives the model too much responsibility: it must select sources, preserve state, choose layout, generate all text, maintain internal consistency, and express the result in a renderable form. Small models suffer most, but large models also produce malformed structures, unsupported claims, and destructive rewrites.\n\n**SurfaceMind** separates intelligence from rendering and authority. It compiles exact sources and governed state into a versioned **Semantic Surface Graph**. A model operates the graph through small, schema-bound **SurfaceDelta** patches. A deterministic validator checks base version, target existence, citation spans, text budgets, ordering, authority, and surface invariants before the renderer updates the view. The model never generates authoritative pixels and never owns truth.\n\nThe architecture externalizes working memory into a visible surface. A compact local model can classify, extract, rank, repair, or patch one region instead of regenerating an entire answer. The system preserves exact source spans, evidence, versions, omissions, and receipts. SurfaceMind's central empirical claim—matched 4B tasks perform better through SurfaceDelta than raw full-answer chat—remains a named go/no-go experiment, not a completed result.", "wordCount": 1769, "sectionCount": 20, "claimCount": 3, "diagramCount": 4, "relatedInstruments": [ "d06-surfacedelta-versus-prose", "d14-workpage-generator" ], "relatedBenchmarks": [ "b05-surfacedelta-uplift" ], "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p07-surfacemind-surfacedelta", "pdfUrl": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p07-surfacemind-surfacedelta.pdf" }, { "id": "p08-generated-operational-memory", "number": "P08", "title": "From Conversation to Project Core", "subtitle": "Generating durable operational memory from captures, decisions, work, and evidence", "category": "Continuity & Canon", "version": "0.1.0", "date": "2026-07-27", "publicationState": "SPECIFIED", "publicationClass": "public-safe working paper", "abstract": "Project memory in contemporary AI systems is usually implemented as transcript history, retrieved snippets, generated summaries, or opaque vendor memory. These forms preserve language but often fail to preserve operational distinctions: a proposal versus a decision, a worker return versus verification, a completed tool call versus human acceptance, an obsolete specification versus the active one.\n\n**Generated Operational Memory** is the process of compiling raw conversation, files, tool events, and human decisions into typed durable project state. The target object is a **Project Core**: an event-sourced record of accepted truth, plans, constraints, permissions, artifacts, work orders, returns, evidence, receipts, dependencies, and unresolved questions. Models receive scoped views of the Core and may propose patches; no provider transcript becomes the sole authority.\n\nThe architecture preserves immutable capture, explicit promotion of intent, non-destructive accepted and working results, dependency-driven staleness, and reopen-from-state behavior. It treats memory generation as a governed compilation problem rather than a summarization feature.", "wordCount": 1509, "sectionCount": 21, "claimCount": 3, "diagramCount": 4, "relatedInstruments": [ "d07-cas-native-work-order", "d14-workpage-generator" ], "relatedBenchmarks": [ "b09-workpage-os" ], "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p08-generated-operational-memory", "pdfUrl": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p08-generated-operational-memory.pdf" }, { "id": "p09-cas-native-agent-coordination", "number": "P09", "title": "Agents That Work on Addressed State", "subtitle": "Work Orders, capability leases, immutable Returns, and evidence-gated coordination", "category": "Agents & Execution", "version": "0.1.0", "date": "2026-07-27", "publicationState": "SPECIFIED", "publicationClass": "public-safe working paper", "abstract": "Most multi-agent systems coordinate through conversation: one model sends another model a message, shared history grows, and completion is judged from generated reports. This is easy to prototype and difficult to trust. Inputs drift, permissions remain implicit, agents duplicate work, stale context is reused, and “done” can mean only that a model generated the word.\n\n**CAS-native agent coordination** treats exact state and bounded contracts as the medium of coordination. An agent receives content-addressed inputs, a Project and authority scope, a Work Order, a dependency root, a lease, and an output schema. It returns immutable artifacts, proposed patches, evidence, costs, and a receipt. Canonical state changes only after deterministic validation and the required acceptance.\n\nThe architecture combines exact CAS, semantic aliases, LCSM, Work Orders, Haygent-style deterministic spines, SurfaceDelta, capability leases, and replayable receipts. Agents do not talk their way into expanded authority. They work on addressed objects.", "wordCount": 1288, "sectionCount": 21, "claimCount": 3, "diagramCount": 3, "relatedInstruments": [ "d07-cas-native-work-order" ], "relatedBenchmarks": [ "b04-actor-agent-runtime", "b03-glyphcas" ], "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p09-cas-native-agent-coordination", "pdfUrl": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p09-cas-native-agent-coordination.pdf" }, { "id": "p10-ooc-fold2", "number": "P10", "title": "A Provenance-Routed Regenerative Object Codec", "subtitle": "The fold/2 P/D/M/R/G representation system with exact proof and fallback", "category": "Compression & Representation", "version": "0.1.0", "date": "2026-07-27", "publicationState": "VERIFIED_MECHANISM", "publicationClass": "public-safe working paper", "abstract": "General-purpose compression assumes that an object is primarily a byte sequence. Many modern objects also have recoverable context: a prior version, a shared dictionary, an exact source, a deterministic generator, a model that emitted the sequence, a procedural recipe, or a lineage graph. Treating every such object as context-free bytes discards information that can be used for storage, transmission, regeneration, and random access. Treating generation as proof, however, risks silent drift and dependency laundering.\n\n**Object-Oriented Compression (OOC)**, serialized as **`fold/2`**, is a proof-bound meta-codec for objects with provenance. It selects among five routes:\n\n- **P:** proven conventional fallback;\n- **D:** dictionary/reference/delta conditioned;\n- **M:** model-conditioned lossless;\n- **R:** exact deterministic regeneration;\n- **G:** regeneration plus exact residual.\n\nEvery route declares dependencies, accounting mode, exact content identity, representation identity, sealed layers, proof, and fallback. The encoder must decode and digest-verify its own output before sealing. The decoder fails closed or follows a declared fallback ladder. A spatial address may guide locality but never determines identity.\n\nThe current proof deck establishes several mechanisms: exact arithmetic and text round trips, boundary verification, corruption refusal, conditioned sample behavior, recipe regeneration, exact residual correction, and seed-drift sensitivity. It does not prove a new general-purpose compressor. The strongest research target is narrower: generated, versioned, related, and structured objects for which provenance creates recoverable redundancy.", "wordCount": 1884, "sectionCount": 21, "claimCount": 3, "diagramCount": 4, "relatedInstruments": [ "d04-fold2-proof-deck" ], "relatedBenchmarks": [ "b02-fold2-codec-laboratory" ], "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p10-ooc-fold2", "pdfUrl": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p10-ooc-fold2.pdf" }, { "id": "p11-content-addressable-video", "number": "P11", "title": "Navigable Temporal Media", "subtitle": "Stable addresses for scenes, events, objects, branches, and exact video evidence", "category": "Temporal Media", "version": "0.1.0", "date": "2026-07-27", "publicationState": "SPECIFIED", "publicationClass": "public-safe working paper", "abstract": "Video is usually addressed by file, URL, frame number, or timestamp. Those coordinates are useful for playback but weak for persistent meaning. A scene can move during an edit. An object can appear across shots. A generated clip can be replaced while preserving narrative role. A branch can diverge from one event and later merge. A timestamp says where bytes occur in one representation; it does not necessarily identify the enduring scene, event, object, or state.\n\n**Content-addressable video** in the Glyphd program is a layered temporal identity system. Exact media segments retain cryptographic identities. Logical temporal objects—scene, shot, event, actor, prop, state, beat, branch—receive stable IDs and lineage. Representations, edits, generations, proxies, and renders remain distinct. A temporal address can resolve from semantic object to the exact source intervals that currently support it.\n\nThe system is not a replacement for codecs. It composes exact media storage, temporal graphs, branch-aware provenance, FOVEA-style multiscale navigation, and `fold/2` representation routes. The goal is video that can be cited, revised, regenerated, navigated, and reasoned over without reducing all continuity to one mutable timeline.", "wordCount": 1689, "sectionCount": 23, "claimCount": 3, "diagramCount": 4, "relatedInstruments": [ "d08-temporal-atlas" ], "relatedBenchmarks": [ "b02-fold2-codec-laboratory" ], "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p11-content-addressable-video", "pdfUrl": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p11-content-addressable-video.pdf" }, { "id": "p12-fractal-temporal-operator", "number": "P12", "title": "Multiresolution Time", "subtitle": "The Fractal Temporal Operator and Glyph Tape for exact history, motifs, branches, and foveated recall", "category": "Temporal Media", "version": "0.1.0", "date": "2026-07-27", "publicationState": "SPECIFIED", "publicationClass": "public-safe working paper", "abstract": "Time in software is usually represented as an ordered sequence: log entries, frames, messages, events, commits, or samples. Sequential order is essential, but it makes multiscale reasoning expensive. The same stream must support questions about the current instant, the surrounding episode, recurring motifs, long-term drift, branch history, and exact provenance.\n\nThe **Fractal Temporal Operator (FTO)** and **Glyph Tape** propose a multiresolution temporal representation in which events retain exact order while also belonging to nested, addressable temporal neighborhoods. Fine-scale detail can be unfolded near an active event; coarser summaries and motifs remain visible farther away. Repeated subgraphs or sequences can be represented through deterministic macros, but the tape never replaces exact history.\n\nThe contribution is a disciplined composition of event sourcing, temporal pyramids, stable event identity, branch lineage, motif dictionaries, and foveated access. Geometry and recurrence organize time; they do not establish truth or guarantee compression. Performance claims remain gated behind comparison with ordinary indexes, segment trees, log compaction, dictionary compression, and competent lazy retrieval.", "wordCount": 1468, "sectionCount": 22, "claimCount": 3, "diagramCount": 3, "relatedInstruments": [ "d08-temporal-atlas" ], "relatedBenchmarks": [ "b01-fovea-correctness-cognition", "b02-fold2-codec-laboratory" ], "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p12-fractal-temporal-operator", "pdfUrl": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p12-fractal-temporal-operator.pdf" }, { "id": "p13-fractal-llm-computation", "number": "P13", "title": "Locality-Preserving Multiscale Computation for Compact Language Models", "subtitle": "Space-filling curves, recursive regions, Q-Frontier selection, and evidence-preserving sparsity", "category": "Model Systems", "version": "0.1.0", "date": "2026-07-27", "publicationState": "SPECIFIED", "publicationClass": "public-safe working paper", "abstract": "Transformer inference repeatedly moves and compares large amounts of state. Sparse attention, retrieval, caching, quantization, and small models reduce this burden, but their gains are often designed independently. The Glyphd fractal-computation program asks whether they can be coordinated through a shared multiscale geometry.\n\nThe proposal combines space-filling curves, recursive tilings, dynamic spatial indexes, foveated context selection, semantic object graphs, and a **Q-Frontier** that identifies the smallest unresolved set requiring expensive reasoning. Local detail is processed densely; increasingly distant or settled regions are represented more coarsely. Hilbert, Z-order, or Gosper-style orderings provide deterministic one-dimensional traversal of multidimensional neighborhoods. The geometry does not compute answers and does not compress arbitrary data. It organizes locality, candidate sparsity, cache layout, and evidence-preserving omission.\n\nThe program has two distinct levels. The first is practical runtime architecture around a compact model: structured outputs, PromptCapsules, prefix reuse, foveated retrieval, small deltas, and software scheduling. The second is model-architecture research: multiscale sparse attention and locality-preserving state layout. The first can be benchmarked now. The second requires kernels, trained models, and matched baselines before any performance claim.", "wordCount": 1803, "sectionCount": 22, "claimCount": 3, "diagramCount": 4, "relatedInstruments": [ "d09-fractal-llm-locality" ], "relatedBenchmarks": [ "b05-surfacedelta-uplift", "b06-jeffe-4b" ], "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p13-fractal-llm-computation", "pdfUrl": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p13-fractal-llm-computation.pdf" }, { "id": "p14-route-m-flight", "number": "P14", "title": "Routing Structured Outputs During Generation", "subtitle": "Route M-Flight, streaming cutlines, multi-surface output, and optional in-flight lossless coding", "category": "Model Systems", "version": "0.1.0", "date": "2026-07-27", "publicationState": "SPECIFIED", "publicationClass": "public-safe working paper", "abstract": "A language model generation already contains information that most application pipelines discard: token probabilities, partial structure, confidence changes, segment boundaries, and the moment at which a typed object becomes complete. Conventional systems wait for the entire response, then invoke a parser, classifier, second model, or postprocessor to rediscover structure that was visible during emission.\n\n**Route M-Flight** is a streaming architecture that routes, validates, records, and optionally entropy-codes typed segments during one generation flight. A model emits into declared channels—claims, actions, deltas, citations, explanations, tool arguments, receipts, or fallback prose. Segment validators operate at cutlines. Completed segments can be sealed with exact context, model/runtime identity, probability quantization, output digest, and raw fallback.\n\nThe immediate product value is not compression. It is lower duplication, earlier useful structure, bounded repair, and one-pass population of several surfaces. The compression extension uses the emitting model's own next-token probabilities to code exact output without a second inference pass, but bit-exact decoder conformance remains a serious research constraint.", "wordCount": 1407, "sectionCount": 22, "claimCount": 3, "diagramCount": 3, "relatedInstruments": [ "d10-route-m-flight-stream" ], "relatedBenchmarks": [ "b02-fold2-codec-laboratory", "b05-surfacedelta-uplift" ], "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p14-route-m-flight", "pdfUrl": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p14-route-m-flight.pdf" }, { "id": "p15-el-jeffe-4b", "number": "P15", "title": "Small Models, Strong Contracts", "subtitle": "EL-JEFFE 4B as a local-first executive intelligence with deterministic authority and receipts", "category": "Compact Intelligence", "version": "0.1.0", "date": "2026-07-27", "publicationState": "IMPLEMENTED", "publicationClass": "public-safe working paper", "abstract": "Compact language models are increasingly capable, but a small local model is often judged against a cloud model on the cloud model's preferred task: absorb a large context, reason freely, write a complete answer, manage tools, remember the user, and police its own authority. That comparison confuses model capability with system architecture.\n\n**EL-JEFFE 4B** is a local-first, mobile-native executive intelligence program built around a strict division of labor. The checkpoint learns semantic compilation, authority, modality, scope, substitution, evidence discipline, routing, abstention, repair, and structured action generation. The deterministic runtime retains personal memory, accepted project truth, permissions, secrets, policy enforcement, tool execution, rollback, receipts, adapter verification, and hardware scheduling.\n\nThe model proposes. **Jefe Core** validates. The device executes. Receipts prove what happened.\n\nThe existing package is a specification and build-control system, not a trained model release. It contains 241 files spanning contracts, schemas, agent guidance, verification scripts, evaluation suites, design briefs, phase gates, and examples. Phase 0 structural verification passed, including linting, type checking, schema validation, agent guards, and twelve Python tests; all model-quality gates remain deliberately incomplete.", "wordCount": 1564, "sectionCount": 22, "claimCount": 3, "diagramCount": 4, "relatedInstruments": [ "d06-surfacedelta-versus-prose" ], "relatedBenchmarks": [ "b06-jeffe-4b" ], "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p15-el-jeffe-4b", "pdfUrl": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p15-el-jeffe-4b.pdf" }, { "id": "p16-schemastack-signal-gate", "number": "P16", "title": "Schema Arbitration Instead of a Policy Monolith", "subtitle": "SchemaStack Signal Gate, actionability, expression gating, and a 390-row local-model audit", "category": "Model Control", "version": "0.1.0", "date": "2026-07-27", "publicationState": "REPRODUCED", "publicationClass": "public-safe working paper", "abstract": "Language-model control systems often inject verbose policy or schema packets into the same prompt used for user-facing articulation. This can improve compliance while creating new failures: false refusal, wrong-frame interpretation, metadata leakage, unnatural answers, and safety language copied into requested artifacts.\n\n**SchemaStack Signal Gate** separates hidden behavioral arbitration from articulation. Candidate frames arise in a **Preconscious Feed**; a weighted **Schema Field** preserves alternatives; an **Actionability** test distinguishes risky words from operational harmful intent; an **Expression Gate** selects the permitted speech act; a compact natural-language **Answer Contract** reaches the articulation model; a verifier detects leakage, refusal errors, unsafe compliance, and contract failure.\n\nThe architecture does not claim consciousness. “Preconscious” names a non-user-facing candidate-control stage, not a private chain of thought.\n\nA live local Ollama audit executed 390 rows across `llama3.1:8b`, Mistral, and Gemma 3 4B; five prompting modes; and SchemaBench plus seed subsets of XSTest and OR-Bench. The audit has raw JSONL, reports, traces, configs, and explicit small-sample caveats. It is valid live evidence, but it is too small and uses seed subsets rather than full official datasets. Results should be presented per metric, not as a broad claim that the system is “safer.”", "wordCount": 1394, "sectionCount": 23, "claimCount": 3, "diagramCount": 3, "relatedInstruments": [ "d11-schemastack-result-explorer" ], "relatedBenchmarks": [ "b07-schemastack-signal-gate" ], "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p16-schemastack-signal-gate", "pdfUrl": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p16-schemastack-signal-gate.pdf" }, { "id": "p17-attention-cursor", "number": "P17", "title": "Attention Nominates; Explicit Action Commits", "subtitle": "Referential Return as a privacy-aware bridge between physical attention and digital context", "category": "Human–Computer Interaction", "version": "0.1.0", "date": "2026-07-27", "publicationState": "SPECIFIED", "publicationClass": "public-safe working paper", "abstract": "Computing devices usually require the user to name or select the object under discussion. In the physical world, however, people routinely establish reference through attention: they look at a chair, return their attention to a partner, and say “that one.” A device with camera, gaze, pose, spatial, or contextual inputs could infer candidate referents—but acting directly on inferred gaze creates the classic “Midas touch” problem, in which looking becomes accidental command.\n\n**Attention Cursor**, also called **Referential Return**, separates nomination from commitment. A transition of attention from a real-world candidate back to a device nominates a ranked referent set. The system displays the candidate and uncertainty. A separate explicit action—tap, voice, button, dwell confirmation, or accessible equivalent—commits the reference.\n\nThe architecture treats attention as a weak, revocable context signal rather than authority. It can reduce the need to describe nearby objects, preserve conversational flow, and bridge physical and digital context. It must also survive false nomination, shared spaces, privacy constraints, disability, and devices without eye tracking.\n\nThe current work is a well-specified interaction hypothesis with simulation-ready contracts. No live gaze-accuracy result is claimed.", "wordCount": 1315, "sectionCount": 22, "claimCount": 3, "diagramCount": 3, "relatedInstruments": [ "d12-attention-cursor" ], "relatedBenchmarks": [ "b08-attention-cursor" ], "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p17-attention-cursor", "pdfUrl": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p17-attention-cursor.pdf" }, { "id": "p18-context-corolla", "number": "P18", "title": "A Spatial Grammar for Work State", "subtitle": "Context Corolla, Identify, and Release & Route across Now, Next, Delegated, Review, Blocked, and Dormant", "category": "Human–Computer Interaction", "version": "0.1.0", "date": "2026-07-27", "publicationState": "IMPLEMENTED", "publicationClass": "public-safe working paper", "abstract": "Task systems usually represent work as lists, boards, or calendars. These surfaces are useful but often force the user to translate their lived relationship to work into generic statuses. **Context Corolla** proposes a compact spatial grammar organized around six practical states—Now, Next, Delegated, Review, Blocked, and Dormant—with **Identify** at the center and **Release & Route** as the voice/action transition.\n\nThe Corolla is not a project database. It is a protected projection over one Project Core. Rotating or selecting a spoke changes focus and prepares a bounded context; it does not silently authorize work. Items retain provenance, evidence, authority, and project identity. The same state can be rendered as radial, list, keyboard, mobile, or accessible views.\n\nThe research question is whether stable spatial state reduces resumption cost, mode confusion, and context reconstruction while preserving the speed of lists. The system remains a specified interaction architecture with runnable prototype lineage; broad productivity uplift is not claimed.", "wordCount": 1116, "sectionCount": 20, "claimCount": 3, "diagramCount": 3, "relatedInstruments": [ "d13-context-corolla" ], "relatedBenchmarks": [ "b09-workpage-os" ], "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p18-context-corolla", "pdfUrl": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p18-context-corolla.pdf" }, { "id": "p19-vwff-visual-direction-compiler", "number": "P19", "title": "Visual-World-First Software", "subtitle": "References, absolute locks, production envelopes, and evidence-bearing visual implementation", "category": "Visual Systems", "version": "0.1.0", "date": "2026-07-27", "publicationState": "IMPLEMENTED", "publicationClass": "public-safe working paper", "abstract": "Software projects usually treat visual direction as a late presentation layer: a moodboard, a design pass, or a set of images that developers reinterpret into components. In AI-assisted production, that separation becomes especially destructive. Models generate plausible but inconsistent interfaces, characters, shots, and products; visual intent is scattered across prompts; approved references lose authority; each regeneration becomes a new interpretation.\n\n**Visual-World-First Software (VWFF)** treats the visual world as an architecture artifact. References, absolute locks, influence, asset roles, continuity, layout, camera, material, typography, responsive crops, production state, and verification become typed project objects. A **Visual Direction Compiler** converts those objects into a frozen **Production Envelope** or shot/build packet. The envelope is inspectable before execution. A separate explicit action authorizes generation or implementation. Returned assets are reviewed against the envelope, attached to exact lineage, and accepted or revised.\n\nThe approach includes a preservation ladder for locked mockups: live reconstruction when faithful, hybrid reconstruction when necessary, and image-backed/sliced assets when code would weaken visual fidelity. The winning output is not the purest CSS. It is the best working system that preserves the approved visual contract.", "wordCount": 1493, "sectionCount": 22, "claimCount": 3, "diagramCount": 4, "relatedInstruments": [ "d14-workpage-generator" ], "relatedBenchmarks": [ "b09-workpage-os" ], "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p19-vwff-visual-direction-compiler", "pdfUrl": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p19-vwff-visual-direction-compiler.pdf" }, { "id": "p20-workpage-os", "number": "P20", "title": "Answers Become Interfaces", "subtitle": "WorkPage OS, typed plans, safe static rendering, and evidence-bearing generated operating surfaces", "category": "Operational Surfaces", "version": "0.1.0", "date": "2026-07-27", "publicationState": "IMPLEMENTED", "publicationClass": "public-safe working paper", "abstract": "Chat interfaces are excellent for discovering intent and poor at carrying serious work to completion. A long answer may contain a plan, commands, decisions, evidence requirements, and checkpoints, yet the user must manually convert the prose into an operating environment.\n\n**WorkPage OS** turns intent and source material into a typed `WorkpagePlan`, then renders a safe, static, portable, interactive **Workpage**. A Workpage may be a build runbook, learning surface, troubleshooting tree, decision page, research dossier, creative production board, or completion audit. It includes copy controls, checkboxes, progress, evidence fields, branching gates, notes, and export. Basic use requires no server, account, or model after generation.\n\nThe model does not generate arbitrary final HTML on the main path. It proposes a structured plan. A deterministic renderer produces the interface. Projects, plans, revisions, sources, exports, critic reports, and evidence remain durable artifacts. Completion claims require evidence.\n\nThe existing v1.1 specification and nineteen-phase runbook define a build-ready local-first Tauri 2 application with Rust, React/TypeScript, SQLite, fixture generation, Ollama and LM Studio adapters, preview isolation, security gates, packaging, and an independent completion audit.", "wordCount": 1520, "sectionCount": 23, "claimCount": 3, "diagramCount": 4, "relatedInstruments": [ "d14-workpage-generator" ], "relatedBenchmarks": [ "b09-workpage-os" ], "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p20-workpage-os", "pdfUrl": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p20-workpage-os.pdf" }, { "id": "p21-mce1-human-in-master-control", "number": "P21", "title": "Human in Master Control", "subtitle": "MCE-1: a minimum complete synthetic economy with constitutional causality and non-sovereign AI", "category": "Constitutional Systems", "version": "0.1.0", "date": "2026-07-27", "publicationState": "SPECIFIED", "publicationClass": "public-safe working paper", "abstract": "Economic and institutional systems are often modeled as markets, optimization problems, or agent simulations. Those models can generate interesting behavior while leaving critical questions undefined: who has standing, which rights cannot be traded, how authority is delegated, what happens when evidence conflicts, how appeals work, when emergency power expires, and whether an optimization engine can rewrite the conditions of human participation.\n\n**MCE-1 — Minimum Complete Economy** is a software-only simulation contract that begins with institutional completeness rather than predictive realism. It models people and organizations, rights and needs, resources and ecological limits, capabilities, projects, work, contribution, claims, obligations, exchange, bounded capital, commons, automation gains, governance, adjudication, concentration, uncertainty, external institutions, branches, failure, and recovery.\n\nThe system may begin with synthetic people, random demand, simplistic equations, fictional institutions, and fake currencies. It may not begin with missing rights, missing authority, missing appeals, missing receipts, hidden callbacks, or a privileged sovereign operator.\n\nLanguage models interpret, explain, propose, and simulate. They do not become the unappealable judge or canonical state authority. LCSM governs recognized state. FOVEA addresses and retrieves it. `fold/2` represents it. SurfaceMind presents it. PolyView synchronizes projections. Gantry governs crossings. A constitutional layer constrains every operation.", "wordCount": 1621, "sectionCount": 25, "claimCount": 3, "diagramCount": 4, "relatedInstruments": [ "d07-cas-native-work-order", "d08-temporal-atlas" ], "relatedBenchmarks": [ "b04-actor-agent-runtime" ], "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p21-mce1-human-in-master-control", "pdfUrl": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p21-mce1-human-in-master-control.pdf" }, { "id": "p22-glyph-desk", "number": "P22", "title": "Chat · Plan · Make", "subtitle": "A human-centered AI project environment with one durable Project Core and three role-separated lenses", "category": "Operational Systems", "version": "0.1.0", "date": "2026-07-27", "publicationState": "SPECIFIED", "publicationClass": "public-safe working paper", "abstract": "The dominant interface for artificial intelligence collapses exploration, commitment, execution, and review into one conversation. This is convenient for short tasks and cognitively expensive for serious projects. A casual thought can look like a directive. A model proposal can be remembered as a user decision. A worker result can replace an accepted artifact. The user must reconstruct current state across chats, providers, files, devices, and tools.\n\n**Glyph Desk** is a human-centered project environment built around three permanent synchronized lenses over one durable **Project Core**:\n\n- **Chat:** understand, explore, question, and evaluate;\n- **Plan:** decide, constrain, structure, and authorize;\n- **Make:** execute, inspect, verify, refresh, and deliver.\n\nThe machine unifies state. The interface separates responsibility.\n\nConversation must cross a boundary before becoming intent. Intent must cross another boundary before becoming consequential action. Accepted and working results remain separate. Models and providers rent scoped project context; the user owns the Project Core. ZEKE can continuously reduce the gap between Plan and working result only within explicit authority, budget, and evidence gates.\n\nGlyph Desk is not differentiated by three columns. It is differentiated by the contracts underneath them.", "wordCount": 1575, "sectionCount": 25, "claimCount": 3, "diagramCount": 4, "relatedInstruments": [ "d07-cas-native-work-order", "d13-context-corolla", "d14-workpage-generator" ], "relatedBenchmarks": [ "b09-workpage-os" ], "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p22-glyph-desk", "pdfUrl": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p22-glyph-desk.pdf" }, { "id": "p23-haygent-deterministic-agents", "number": "P23", "title": "Tools Holding an LLM", "subtitle": "Haygent deterministic spines, bounded intelligence slots, evidence gates, and truthful halt", "category": "Agents & Execution", "version": "0.1.0", "date": "2026-07-27", "publicationState": "SPECIFIED", "publicationClass": "public-safe working paper", "abstract": "Autonomous-agent systems commonly ask a language model to choose the next action, maintain memory, interpret tool output, decide when it is finished, and narrate success. Haygent reverses that architecture. A Haygent is a deterministic, contract-bound process that contains narrow intelligence slots. The runtime—not the model—owns control flow, permissions, state packets, evidence gates, repair budgets, replay, and completion. The model may adjust only declared schema fields. Progress exists only when evidence objects satisfy a gate, and exhausted repair produces a truthful HALT rather than a fabricated success.", "wordCount": 1463, "sectionCount": 18, "claimCount": 2, "diagramCount": 3, "relatedInstruments": [ "d15-haygent-run-inspector" ], "relatedBenchmarks": [ "b10-haygent-bounded-agent-correctness" ], "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p23-haygent-deterministic-agents", "pdfUrl": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p23-haygent-deterministic-agents.pdf" }, { "id": "p24-microscope-resolution-frontier", "number": "P24", "title": "Resolution Frontier Search", "subtitle": "Evidence-backed causal site search for local language models", "category": "Interpretability", "version": "0.1.0", "date": "2026-07-27", "publicationState": "IMPLEMENTED", "publicationClass": "public-safe working paper", "abstract": "MicroScope is an interpretability workbench that searches for candidate internal sites whose intervention behavior may explain a model output under a bounded probe. Resolution Frontier Search extends isolated activation inspection into an evidence ladder: baseline, ablation, restoration, and neighbor control. It ranks residual-stream and attention-head candidates with decomposed metrics, exports exact tensors and intervention artifacts, and refuses to promote a ranked site into a universal mechanistic claim without the required controls and benchmark families.", "wordCount": 1270, "sectionCount": 18, "claimCount": 2, "diagramCount": 3, "relatedInstruments": [ "d16-microscope-resolution-map" ], "relatedBenchmarks": [ "b11-microscope-causal-ladders" ], "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p24-microscope-resolution-frontier", "pdfUrl": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p24-microscope-resolution-frontier.pdf" }, { "id": "p25-continuity-core", "number": "P25", "title": "Continuity Core", "subtitle": "Concept identity, automatic checkpoints, project resurrection, and source-authority separation", "category": "Continuity & Canon", "version": "0.1.0", "date": "2026-07-27", "publicationState": "SPECIFIED", "publicationClass": "public-safe working paper", "abstract": "Continuity Core addresses a failure that appears above individual apps: projects, concepts, decisions, aliases, receipts, and implementation state are scattered across providers, repositories, files, and conversations. It defines an account-level continuity substrate with stable concept identity, event-sourced canon, alias and supersession edges, automatic checkpoints, source and authority labels, and a resurrection protocol that can reconstruct what a dormant project is, what is accepted, what is blocked, and what should happen next.", "wordCount": 1230, "sectionCount": 19, "claimCount": 2, "diagramCount": 3, "relatedInstruments": [ "d17-continuity-resurrection" ], "relatedBenchmarks": [ "b12-continuity-recovery" ], "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p25-continuity-core", "pdfUrl": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p25-continuity-core.pdf" }, { "id": "p26-glyph-tokens", "number": "P26", "title": "Glyph Tokens", "subtitle": "A typed semantic intermediate representation between language and governed action", "category": "Semantic Protocols", "version": "0.1.0", "date": "2026-07-27", "publicationState": "SPECIFIED", "publicationClass": "public-safe working paper", "abstract": "Glyph Tokens are typed semantic carriers that compile messy human language into inspectable propositions, authorities, conditions, constraints, substitutions, uncertainties, evidence references, and actions. They are not tokenizer tokens and are not trusted merely because they are structured. Trust derives from source, authority, signature, project scope, compiler version, validators, current state, and human approval where required. The protocol is intended to make intent, routing, caching, verification, and consequential execution operate on one explicit graph while preserving exact source text and ambiguity.", "wordCount": 1166, "sectionCount": 20, "claimCount": 2, "diagramCount": 3, "relatedInstruments": [ "d18-glyph-token-compiler" ], "relatedBenchmarks": [ "b13-glyph-token-compilation" ], "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p26-glyph-tokens", "pdfUrl": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p26-glyph-tokens.pdf" }, { "id": "p27-spatial-home-as-state", "number": "P27", "title": "Place That Means Something", "subtitle": "Spatial computing as a truthful projection of state, consent, work, and social commitment", "category": "Spatial & Social Systems", "version": "0.1.0", "date": "2026-07-27", "publicationState": "SPECIFIED", "publicationClass": "public-safe working paper", "abstract": "Glyphd’s Architectural Home proposes that digital place becomes a real interaction paradigm only when a room or object projects or declares meaningful state. The map is not a second database, furniture is not disguised navigation, ambient activity is forbidden unless a real event occurred, presence is declared rather than surveilled, and social weight derives from bounded commitments and receipts rather than follower count or engagement extraction. The architecture coexists with faster radial, Workfield, Corolla, list, and keyboard projections over the same Project Core.", "wordCount": 1198, "sectionCount": 18, "claimCount": 2, "diagramCount": 3, "relatedInstruments": [ "d19-spatial-home-projection-lab" ], "relatedBenchmarks": [ "b14-spatial-home-behavior" ], "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p27-spatial-home-as-state", "pdfUrl": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p27-spatial-home-as-state.pdf" }, { "id": "p28-production-packets-generative-media", "number": "P28", "title": "Do Not Just Output Prompts", "subtitle": "Production packets, ordered visual routes, plan-graph approval, and repair-aware generative media", "category": "Visual Systems", "version": "0.1.0", "date": "2026-07-27", "publicationState": "IMPLEMENTED", "publicationClass": "public-safe working paper", "abstract": "Generative-media tools commonly collapse direction, references, timing, provider choice, cost, and continuity into one prompt. The Glyphd media corpus instead treats the unit of work as a production packet: a versioned, inspectable object containing visual doctrine, reference roles, scene timing, shot beats, camera and sound rules, model/provider route, cost estimate, negative constraints, continuity locks, review rubric, and repair plan. Ordered Omni sequence sheets provide a low-bandwidth visual route for models that respond to image reference order. No render begins until the user approves the Video Plan Node Graph.", "wordCount": 1136, "sectionCount": 18, "claimCount": 2, "diagramCount": 3, "relatedInstruments": [ "d20-production-packet-compiler" ], "relatedBenchmarks": [ "b15-production-packet-adherence" ], "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p28-production-packets-generative-media", "pdfUrl": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p28-production-packets-generative-media.pdf" }, { "id": "p29-ambient-integration-web", "number": "P29", "title": "Disjointed, Yet Joined", "subtitle": "The Ambient Integration Web and the human operator in a world of self-adapting independent projects", "category": "Agents & Coordination", "version": "0.1.0", "date": "2026-07-30", "publicationState": "HYPOTHESIS", "publicationClass": "public-safe working paper", "abstract": "The web already contains many mechanisms required for software to notice change and adapt, but they remain disjointed. This paper proposes the Ambient Integration Web: independently owned projects with machine-readable missions, constraints, capabilities, acceptance policies, and bounded scouts that find and propose useful changes. Ambient discovery never implies ambient authority; canonical state changes only through scoped authorization, verification, acceptance, and reversible publication. The human remains responsible for whether a connection should exist, for whom, and under what conditions.", "wordCount": 6168, "sectionCount": 22, "claimCount": 5, "diagramCount": 4, "relatedInstruments": [], "relatedBenchmarks": [], "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p29-ambient-integration-web", "pdfUrl": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p29-ambient-integration-web.pdf" } ], "claims": [ { "id": "P01-C01", "paperId": "p01-manifestation-gap", "paperTitle": "Generating Language Is Not the Same as Doing What the Language Says", "category": "Foundations", "statement": "Generated language can imitate the report of completion without any necessary external state change.", "state": "VERIFIED_MECHANISM", "scope": "Architectural observation; not a statistical claim.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P01-S01", "P01-S02", "P01-S03" ], "limitations": [ "No controlled user study is reported in this edition." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p01-manifestation-gap" }, { "id": "P01-C02", "paperId": "p01-manifestation-gap", "paperTitle": "Generating Language Is Not the Same as Doing What the Language Says", "category": "Foundations", "statement": "A durable latent object can separate proposal, authorization, execution, verification, acceptance, and publication.", "state": "SPECIFIED", "scope": "Cross-project Glyphd architecture.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P01-S02", "P01-S03", "P01-S04" ], "limitations": [ "Benefits require comparative experiments." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p01-manifestation-gap" }, { "id": "P01-C03", "paperId": "p01-manifestation-gap", "paperTitle": "Generating Language Is Not the Same as Doing What the Language Says", "category": "Foundations", "statement": "Progress should be rendered from object state and evidence rather than generated as conversational reassurance.", "state": "HYPOTHESIS", "scope": "Human-computer interaction thesis.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P01-S01", "P01-S05" ], "limitations": [ "Interface cost and user preference remain to be measured." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p01-manifestation-gap" }, { "id": "P02-C01", "paperId": "p02-lcsm-backboard", "paperTitle": "LCSM / Backboard", "category": "Continuity & Canon", "statement": "LCSM separates immutable historical versions from a current canonical pointer and records change through append-preserving journal operations.", "state": "SPECIFIED", "scope": "Protocol and reference workbench.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P02-S01", "P02-S05" ], "limitations": [ "Production persistence implementation requires independent verification." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p02-lcsm-backboard" }, { "id": "P02-C02", "paperId": "p02-lcsm-backboard", "paperTitle": "LCSM / Backboard", "category": "Continuity & Canon", "statement": "The Backboard reference loop can contain replaceable semantic judgment inside deterministic validation, authority, journal, and projection mechanics.", "state": "VERIFIED_MECHANISM", "scope": "Fixture-based workbench design and acceptance contract.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P02-S01" ], "limitations": [ "A live model classifier is not validated by the reference mechanism alone." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p02-lcsm-backboard" }, { "id": "P02-C03", "paperId": "p02-lcsm-backboard", "paperTitle": "LCSM / Backboard", "category": "Continuity & Canon", "statement": "State-based working sets should reduce obsolete-context errors and resumption cost relative to transcript-only memory.", "state": "HYPOTHESIS", "scope": "Comparative human/model evaluation.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P02-S01", "P02-S03", "P02-S04" ], "limitations": [ "Matched comparative study remains outstanding." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p02-lcsm-backboard" }, { "id": "P03-C01", "paperId": "p03-fovea-address-fabric", "paperTitle": "The Future Is Foveated", "category": "Addressing & Retrieval", "statement": "The FOVEA source implements coherent deterministic quadkey, neighborhood, exact-offset, Hilbert, and URI mechanisms.", "state": "VERIFIED_MECHANISM", "scope": "Supplied reference implementation and proof deck.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P03-S01", "P03-S02" ], "limitations": [ "Cross-language and exact-head Rust execution still require a current receipt." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p03-fovea-address-fabric" }, { "id": "P03-C02", "paperId": "p03-fovea-address-fabric", "paperTitle": "The Future Is Foveated", "category": "Addressing & Retrieval", "statement": "A FOVEA atlas can be treated as a reconstructable materialized projection rather than canonical truth.", "state": "SPECIFIED", "scope": "LCSM–FOVEA integration invariant.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P03-S01", "P03-S03", "P03-S04" ], "limitations": [ "Production replay implementation must be tested." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p03-fovea-address-fabric" }, { "id": "P03-C03", "paperId": "p03-fovea-address-fabric", "paperTitle": "The Future Is Foveated", "category": "Addressing & Retrieval", "statement": "Procedural landmarks improve spatial memory and peripheral awareness over a plain recursive grid.", "state": "HYPOTHESIS", "scope": "Human-computer interaction experiment.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P03-S01", "P03-S03" ], "limitations": [ "No qualifying controlled A/B is published." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p03-fovea-address-fabric" }, { "id": "P03-C04", "paperId": "p03-fovea-address-fabric", "paperTitle": "The Future Is Foveated", "category": "Addressing & Retrieval", "statement": "Foveated retrieval can reduce context movement relative to competent lazy loading while preserving exact proof.", "state": "HYPOTHESIS", "scope": "Real project atlases.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P03-S02", "P03-S05" ], "limitations": [ "The ≥2× gate remains unrun in an accepted benchmark." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p03-fovea-address-fabric" }, { "id": "P04-C01", "paperId": "p04-memory-is-not-the-lens", "paperTitle": "Memory Is Not the Lens", "category": "Continuity & Canon", "statement": "Canonical truth and optical projection can be separated by a one-way dependency in which the lens is reconstructable from the journal.", "state": "SPECIFIED", "scope": "LCSM–FOVEA integration.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P04-S01", "P04-S02", "P04-S03" ], "limitations": [ "Full integrated destructive-rebuild receipt remains outstanding." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p04-memory-is-not-the-lens" }, { "id": "P04-C02", "paperId": "p04-memory-is-not-the-lens", "paperTitle": "Memory Is Not the Lens", "category": "Continuity & Canon", "statement": "Separating logical, exact-content, representation, spatial, and projection identities prevents address and cache changes from silently redefining canonical objects.", "state": "VERIFIED_MECHANISM", "scope": "Reference schemas and GlyphCAS prototype semantics.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P04-S03", "P04-S04" ], "limitations": [ "Production cross-service compatibility remains to be demonstrated." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p04-memory-is-not-the-lens" }, { "id": "P04-C03", "paperId": "p04-memory-is-not-the-lens", "paperTitle": "Memory Is Not the Lens", "category": "Continuity & Canon", "statement": "Dual-plane context construction can reduce obsolete-context errors and context movement compared with transcript or retrieval-only baselines.", "state": "HYPOTHESIS", "scope": "Matched model benchmark.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P04-S01", "P04-S02", "P04-S04" ], "limitations": [ "No accepted end-to-end comparative run is published." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p04-memory-is-not-the-lens" }, { "id": "P05-C01", "paperId": "p05-glyphcas", "paperTitle": "GlyphCAS", "category": "Identity & Reuse", "statement": "The reference package implements exact CAS, bounded deterministic canonicalization, semantic/contextual keys, isolation, invalidation, receipts, representation routes, and ten passing unit tests.", "state": "IMPLEMENTED", "scope": "Python reference package described in the design report.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P05-S01" ], "limitations": [ "Not a production distributed CAS; exact source package should be linked in public artifacts." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p05-glyphcas" }, { "id": "P05-C02", "paperId": "p05-glyphcas", "paperTitle": "GlyphCAS", "category": "Identity & Reuse", "statement": "Exact content identity can remain separate from semantic alias identity while still enabling controlled reuse.", "state": "VERIFIED_MECHANISM", "scope": "Reference schemas and tests.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P05-S01", "P05-S03" ], "limitations": [ "Semantic compiler quality is narrow and version-dependent." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p05-glyphcas" }, { "id": "P05-C03", "paperId": "p05-glyphcas", "paperTitle": "GlyphCAS", "category": "Identity & Reuse", "statement": "Layered early exits reduce end-to-end cost for selected LLM workloads without material quality regression.", "state": "HYPOTHESIS", "scope": "Adapter- and workload-specific benchmark.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P05-S01", "P05-S04" ], "limitations": [ "No accepted production-scale latency benchmark is published." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p05-glyphcas" }, { "id": "P06-C01", "paperId": "p06-actor-before-agent", "paperTitle": "Actor Before Agent", "category": "Agents & Simulation", "statement": "Persistent Actor Capsules and temporary Agent Processes can be represented as separate versioned runtime objects joined by validated World Patches.", "state": "SPECIFIED", "scope": "MAIN CHARACTER and generalized runtime.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P06-S01", "P06-S02" ], "limitations": [ "Integrated production implementation has not been independently receipted." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p06-actor-before-agent" }, { "id": "P06-C02", "paperId": "p06-actor-before-agent", "paperTitle": "Actor Before Agent", "category": "Agents & Simulation", "statement": "Deterministic eligibility and cooldown allow many actors to persist without continuous LLM inference.", "state": "VERIFIED_MECHANISM", "scope": "Scheduler design and browser demo potential.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P06-S01" ], "limitations": [ "Cost improvement depends on workload and implementation." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p06-actor-before-agent" }, { "id": "P06-C03", "paperId": "p06-actor-before-agent", "paperTitle": "Actor Before Agent", "category": "Agents & Simulation", "statement": "Actor–Agent separation improves long-duration identity coherence and reduces epistemic leakage compared with conventional chat agents.", "state": "HYPOTHESIS", "scope": "Matched simulation benchmark.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P06-S01", "P06-S03" ], "limitations": [ "No accepted longitudinal comparative run is published." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p06-actor-before-agent" }, { "id": "P07-C01", "paperId": "p07-surfacemind-surfacedelta", "paperTitle": "SurfaceMind and SurfaceDelta", "category": "Operational Surfaces", "statement": "SurfaceMind R0 defines a typed Semantic Surface Graph, deterministic rendering/verification contracts, and verified example surfaces.", "state": "IMPLEMENTED", "scope": "R0 repository foundation.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P07-S01" ], "limitations": [ "Integrated mobile runtime and broad surface library remain incomplete." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p07-surfacemind-surfacedelta" }, { "id": "P07-C02", "paperId": "p07-surfacemind-surfacedelta", "paperTitle": "SurfaceMind and SurfaceDelta", "category": "Operational Surfaces", "statement": "SurfaceDelta provides an inspectable optimistic-concurrency mutation unit with source-span validation before rendering.", "state": "SPECIFIED", "scope": "Max-Flex and GlyphCAS architecture.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P07-S02", "P07-S03", "P07-S04" ], "limitations": [ "Production validators require exact repository receipts." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p07-surfacemind-surfacedelta" }, { "id": "P07-C03", "paperId": "p07-surfacemind-surfacedelta", "paperTitle": "SurfaceMind and SurfaceDelta", "category": "Operational Surfaces", "statement": "A 4B model operating through SurfaceDelta outperforms matched raw full-answer generation on reliability, citation, latency, and usefulness.", "state": "AWAITING_LOCAL_RUN", "scope": "E1 matched experiment.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P07-S02", "P07-S03" ], "limitations": [ "This is the go/no-go hypothesis and must not be stated as achieved." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p07-surfacemind-surfacedelta" }, { "id": "P08-C01", "paperId": "p08-generated-operational-memory", "paperTitle": "From Conversation to Project Core", "category": "Continuity & Canon", "statement": "A Project Core can preserve Capture, interpreted intent, Plan, Work Orders, Returns, Verification, Acceptance, artifacts, dependencies, and receipts as separate durable objects.", "state": "SPECIFIED", "scope": "Glyph Desk/Continuity architecture.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P08-S01", "P08-S02", "P08-S04" ], "limitations": [ "No universal production implementation is claimed." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p08-generated-operational-memory" }, { "id": "P08-C02", "paperId": "p08-generated-operational-memory", "paperTitle": "From Conversation to Project Core", "category": "Continuity & Canon", "statement": "Accepted and working result references can remain separate so background work cannot destroy the last accepted artifact.", "state": "VERIFIED_MECHANISM", "scope": "Non-destructive project-state contract.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P08-S01", "P08-S04" ], "limitations": [ "Exact repository implementation varies by product." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p08-generated-operational-memory" }, { "id": "P08-C03", "paperId": "p08-generated-operational-memory", "paperTitle": "From Conversation to Project Core", "category": "Continuity & Canon", "statement": "Generated Operational Memory reduces resumption time and provider-handoff errors versus transcript memory.", "state": "HYPOTHESIS", "scope": "Long-running project benchmark.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P08-S02", "P08-S03" ], "limitations": [ "Controlled matched evaluation remains outstanding." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p08-generated-operational-memory" }, { "id": "P09-C01", "paperId": "p09-cas-native-agent-coordination", "paperTitle": "Agents That Work on Addressed State", "category": "Agents & Execution", "statement": "Work Orders, capability leases, addressed inputs, Returns, patches, evidence gates, and receipts form a replayable alternative to conversational agent coordination.", "state": "SPECIFIED", "scope": "Cross-system coordination architecture.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P09-S01", "P09-S02", "P09-S03" ], "limitations": [ "Integrated multi-worker reference implementation remains to be completed." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p09-cas-native-agent-coordination" }, { "id": "P09-C02", "paperId": "p09-cas-native-agent-coordination", "paperTitle": "Agents That Work on Addressed State", "category": "Agents & Execution", "statement": "Deterministic spines can contain model judgment inside declared adjustable fields and bounded repair loops.", "state": "VERIFIED_MECHANISM", "scope": "Haygent and donor execution patterns.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P09-S01", "P09-S04" ], "limitations": [ "Exact implementation evidence varies by donor system." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p09-cas-native-agent-coordination" }, { "id": "P09-C03", "paperId": "p09-cas-native-agent-coordination", "paperTitle": "Agents That Work on Addressed State", "category": "Agents & Execution", "statement": "CAS-native coordination reduces false completion, duplicate work, and handoff loss relative to agent chat.", "state": "HYPOTHESIS", "scope": "Matched multi-agent benchmark.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P09-S01", "P09-S02" ], "limitations": [ "No accepted comparative benchmark is published." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p09-cas-native-agent-coordination" }, { "id": "P10-C01", "paperId": "p10-ooc-fold2", "paperTitle": "A Provenance-Routed Regenerative Object Codec", "category": "Compression & Representation", "statement": "The supplied proof deck demonstrates exact round trips, boundary verification, corruption refusal, conditioned coding, recipe regeneration, residual correction, and seed-drift sensitivity in twelve passing self-tests.", "state": "VERIFIED_MECHANISM", "scope": "Recorded JavaScript proof-deck execution.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P10-S02" ], "limitations": [ "Synthetic and small-sample mechanisms; Rust suites were not run in that assessment." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p10-ooc-fold2" }, { "id": "P10-C02", "paperId": "p10-ooc-fold2", "paperTitle": "A Provenance-Routed Regenerative Object Codec", "category": "Compression & Representation", "statement": "fold/2 defines a proof-bound P/D/M/R/G meta-codec with dependency accounting, exact verification, and fallback.", "state": "SPECIFIED", "scope": "v0.2 format and benchmark contract.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P10-S01", "P10-S03", "P10-S04" ], "limitations": [ "Ratification and cross-platform conformance must be verified against current exact head." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p10-ooc-fold2" }, { "id": "P11-C01", "paperId": "p11-content-addressable-video", "paperTitle": "Navigable Temporal Media", "category": "Temporal Media", "statement": "Exact media segments, logical temporal objects, representations, timeline intervals, and branches can be represented as separate linked identities.", "state": "SPECIFIED", "scope": "Content-addressable video architecture.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P11-S01", "P11-S02", "P11-S03" ], "limitations": [ "Integrated media graph implementation remains incomplete." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p11-content-addressable-video" }, { "id": "P11-C02", "paperId": "p11-content-addressable-video", "paperTitle": "Navigable Temporal Media", "category": "Temporal Media", "statement": "Recipe and residual mechanisms provide an exact representation path for generated media under pinned dependencies.", "state": "VERIFIED_MECHANISM", "scope": "Synthetic proof-deck mechanism.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P11-S02", "P11-S03" ], "limitations": [ "Real video pipeline conformance is not established." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p11-content-addressable-video" }, { "id": "P11-C03", "paperId": "p11-content-addressable-video", "paperTitle": "Navigable Temporal Media", "category": "Temporal Media", "statement": "Stable scene/event/object addressing improves editing and retrieval across revisions compared with timestamp-only workflows.", "state": "HYPOTHESIS", "scope": "Matched video workflow study.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P11-S01", "P11-S04", "P11-S05" ], "limitations": [ "No accepted user benchmark is published." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p11-content-addressable-video" }, { "id": "P12-C01", "paperId": "p12-fractal-temporal-operator", "paperTitle": "Multiresolution Time", "category": "Temporal Media", "statement": "Exact event streams can be projected into nested temporal cells, branch structures, and deterministic motifs without replacing canonical history.", "state": "SPECIFIED", "scope": "FTO/Glyph Tape architecture.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P12-S01", "P12-S02", "P12-S03" ], "limitations": [ "Normative implementation and golden-vector suite remain to be consolidated." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p12-fractal-temporal-operator" }, { "id": "P12-C02", "paperId": "p12-fractal-temporal-operator", "paperTitle": "Multiresolution Time", "category": "Temporal Media", "statement": "Multiresolution temporal retrieval reduces context movement while preserving relevant exact event proof.", "state": "HYPOTHESIS", "scope": "Project, media, and agent histories.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P12-S01", "P12-S03" ], "limitations": [ "Matched lazy-log and retrieval benchmarks remain outstanding." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p12-fractal-temporal-operator" }, { "id": "P12-C03", "paperId": "p12-fractal-temporal-operator", "paperTitle": "Multiresolution Time", "category": "Temporal Media", "statement": "Repeated temporal motifs can support deterministic macro reuse and compression.", "state": "HYPOTHESIS", "scope": "Structured event families.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P12-S01", "P12-S02" ], "limitations": [ "Must be compared with mature dictionary/log-compression baselines." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p12-fractal-temporal-operator" }, { "id": "P13-C01", "paperId": "p13-fractal-llm-computation", "paperTitle": "Locality-Preserving Multiscale Computation for Compact Language Models", "category": "Model Systems", "statement": "Space-filling curves, recursive regions, FOVEA retrieval, Q-Frontier selection, and structured deltas form a coherent multiscale runtime research architecture.", "state": "SPECIFIED", "scope": "Runtime and model-research program.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P13-S01", "P13-S02", "P13-S03", "P13-S04" ], "limitations": [ "Architecture spans multiple maturity levels." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p13-fractal-llm-computation" }, { "id": "P13-C02", "paperId": "p13-fractal-llm-computation", "paperTitle": "Locality-Preserving Multiscale Computation for Compact Language Models", "category": "Model Systems", "statement": "The runtime stack can reduce tokens moved and redundant generation for compact models.", "state": "AWAITING_LOCAL_RUN", "scope": "Matched Max-Flex experiments.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P13-S02", "P13-S04" ], "limitations": [ "No complete accepted end-to-end uplift result." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p13-fractal-llm-computation" }, { "id": "P13-C03", "paperId": "p13-fractal-llm-computation", "paperTitle": "Locality-Preserving Multiscale Computation for Compact Language Models", "category": "Model Systems", "statement": "A locality-preserving multiscale sparse-attention model outperforms a dense compact transformer at matched quality and budget.", "state": "HYPOTHESIS", "scope": "Future trained architecture.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P13-S01" ], "limitations": [ "No trained model or kernel benchmark is claimed." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p13-fractal-llm-computation" }, { "id": "P14-C01", "paperId": "p14-route-m-flight", "paperTitle": "Routing Structured Outputs During Generation", "category": "Model Systems", "statement": "A generation flight can be divided into typed cutline segments that validate and populate multiple application surfaces.", "state": "SPECIFIED", "scope": "Streaming runtime architecture.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P14-S01", "P14-S03", "P14-S05" ], "limitations": [ "Integrated live implementation remains outstanding." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p14-route-m-flight" }, { "id": "P14-C02", "paperId": "p14-route-m-flight", "paperTitle": "Routing Structured Outputs During Generation", "category": "Model Systems", "statement": "Local research tooling captured next-token top-k probabilities and separate forward tensors under explicit caveats.", "state": "IMPLEMENTED", "scope": "Recorded local run artifact.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P14-S04" ], "limitations": [ "Not a complete per-step hidden-state trace or M-flight codec." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p14-route-m-flight" }, { "id": "P14-C03", "paperId": "p14-route-m-flight", "paperTitle": "Routing Structured Outputs During Generation", "category": "Model Systems", "statement": "M-flight reduces total latency and storage for structured LLM output compared with full response plus second-pass parsing/compression.", "state": "HYPOTHESIS", "scope": "Matched local runtime experiment.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P14-S01", "P14-S02", "P14-S03" ], "limitations": [ "Product and codec benefits must be measured separately." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p14-route-m-flight" }, { "id": "P15-C01", "paperId": "p15-el-jeffe-4b", "paperTitle": "Small Models, Strong Contracts", "category": "Compact Intelligence", "statement": "The EL-JEFFE package contains 241 specification/control files and a structurally verified Phase 0 harness.", "state": "IMPLEMENTED", "scope": "Specification package, not model release.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P15-S01", "P15-S02", "P15-S03" ], "limitations": [ "Public artifact should expose manifest and verification receipt." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p15-el-jeffe-4b" }, { "id": "P15-C02", "paperId": "p15-el-jeffe-4b", "paperTitle": "Small Models, Strong Contracts", "category": "Compact Intelligence", "statement": "Phase 0 checks passed, including schema/YAML validation, agent guards, lint, mypy, and twelve tests; model gates remain incomplete by design.", "state": "REPRODUCED", "scope": "Recorded control-package verification.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P15-S02" ], "limitations": [ "Not independently rerun in this paper-authoring turn." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p15-el-jeffe-4b" }, { "id": "P15-C03", "paperId": "p15-el-jeffe-4b", "paperTitle": "Small Models, Strong Contracts", "category": "Compact Intelligence", "statement": "A trained EL-JEFFE checkpoint outperforms base compact models or cloud references.", "state": "AWAITING_LOCAL_RUN", "scope": "Future versioned checkpoint.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P15-S01", "P15-S04" ], "limitations": [ "No weights or qualifying evaluation exist in the package." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p15-el-jeffe-4b" }, { "id": "P16-C01", "paperId": "p16-schemastack-signal-gate", "paperTitle": "Schema Arbitration Instead of a Policy Monolith", "category": "Model Control", "statement": "Signal Gate implements a staged control concept: candidate frames, weighted field, actionability, expression gate, compact answer contract, and repair.", "state": "IMPLEMENTED", "scope": "SchemaStack v1 code/addendum and live run modes.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P16-S01", "P16-S03", "P16-S04" ], "limitations": [ "Exact public source repository should be linked." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p16-schemastack-signal-gate" }, { "id": "P16-C02", "paperId": "p16-schemastack-signal-gate", "paperTitle": "Schema Arbitration Instead of a Policy Monolith", "category": "Model Control", "statement": "The live audit completed 390 rows across three models, five modes, and three small benchmark families with raw artifacts.", "state": "REPRODUCED", "scope": "Recorded Ollama audit.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P16-S04", "P16-S05" ], "limitations": [ "Small sample; seed subsets are not full official evaluations." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p16-schemastack-signal-gate" }, { "id": "P16-C03", "paperId": "p16-schemastack-signal-gate", "paperTitle": "Schema Arbitration Instead of a Policy Monolith", "category": "Model Control", "statement": "Signal Gate is safer or more helpful in general than raw/static prompting.", "state": "INCONCLUSIVE", "scope": "Broad external claim.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P16-S02", "P16-S04" ], "limitations": [ "Must report metric-specific and model-specific results; no universal conclusion." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p16-schemastack-signal-gate" }, { "id": "P17-C01", "paperId": "p17-attention-cursor", "paperTitle": "Attention Nominates; Explicit Action Commits", "category": "Human–Computer Interaction", "statement": "Referential Return separates uncertain attention-based nomination from explicit committed action.", "state": "SPECIFIED", "scope": "Interaction and authority contract.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P17-S01", "P17-S02", "P17-S03" ], "limitations": [ "No live sensor implementation is claimed." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p17-attention-cursor" }, { "id": "P17-C02", "paperId": "p17-attention-cursor", "paperTitle": "Attention Nominates; Explicit Action Commits", "category": "Human–Computer Interaction", "statement": "The interaction can be demonstrated safely through a camera-free deterministic simulation.", "state": "VERIFIED_MECHANISM", "scope": "Browser demo design.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P17-S01" ], "limitations": [ "Simulation does not validate gaze accuracy." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p17-attention-cursor" }, { "id": "P17-C03", "paperId": "p17-attention-cursor", "paperTitle": "Attention Nominates; Explicit Action Commits", "category": "Human–Computer Interaction", "statement": "Referential Return reduces reference-establishment time without increasing false commits or privacy cost.", "state": "AWAITING_LOCAL_RUN", "scope": "Chair/shared-space user study.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P17-S01" ], "limitations": [ "Requires live study and accessibility evaluation." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p17-attention-cursor" }, { "id": "P18-C01", "paperId": "p18-context-corolla", "paperTitle": "A Spatial Grammar for Work State", "category": "Human–Computer Interaction", "statement": "Context Corolla defines a six-state radial projection over Project Core with Identify and Release & Route interactions.", "state": "IMPLEMENTED", "scope": "Prototype and design canon.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P18-S01", "P18-S02" ], "limitations": [ "Exact integrated runtime maturity should be verified in current prototype." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p18-context-corolla" }, { "id": "P18-C02", "paperId": "p18-context-corolla", "paperTitle": "A Spatial Grammar for Work State", "category": "Human–Computer Interaction", "statement": "The Corolla remains a projection and cannot become a second project database or authority.", "state": "SPECIFIED", "scope": "Glyphd V1 invariant.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P18-S02", "P18-S03", "P18-S04" ], "limitations": [ "Requires reconstruction and synchronization tests." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p18-context-corolla" }, { "id": "P18-C03", "paperId": "p18-context-corolla", "paperTitle": "A Spatial Grammar for Work State", "category": "Human–Computer Interaction", "statement": "The spatial grammar reduces resumption cost and state confusion relative to lists/Kanban.", "state": "AWAITING_LOCAL_RUN", "scope": "Comparative HCI study.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P18-S03" ], "limitations": [ "No accepted comparative data is published." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p18-context-corolla" }, { "id": "P19-C01", "paperId": "p19-vwff-visual-direction-compiler", "paperTitle": "Visual-World-First Software", "category": "Visual Systems", "statement": "VWFF represents references, roles, locks, production envelopes, Returns, verification, and lineage as versioned project objects.", "state": "SPECIFIED", "scope": "Cross-media visual architecture.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P19-S01", "P19-S02", "P19-S04" ], "limitations": [ "Unified compiler implementation remains to be receipted." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p19-vwff-visual-direction-compiler" }, { "id": "P19-C02", "paperId": "p19-vwff-visual-direction-compiler", "paperTitle": "Visual-World-First Software", "category": "Visual Systems", "statement": "The preservation ladder and image-first production packet methods are implemented in multiple project workflows and templates.", "state": "IMPLEMENTED", "scope": "Design/build packs and visual assets.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P19-S01", "P19-S02", "P19-S03" ], "limitations": [ "Cross-project consistency should be validated." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p19-vwff-visual-direction-compiler" }, { "id": "P19-C03", "paperId": "p19-vwff-visual-direction-compiler", "paperTitle": "Visual-World-First Software", "category": "Visual Systems", "statement": "Compiled production envelopes reduce visual drift, regeneration cycles, and cost compared with ordinary prompt folders.", "state": "HYPOTHESIS", "scope": "Matched creative-production benchmark.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P19-S02", "P19-S03" ], "limitations": [ "No accepted comparative study is published." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p19-vwff-visual-direction-compiler" }, { "id": "P20-C01", "paperId": "p20-workpage-os", "paperTitle": "Answers Become Interfaces", "category": "Operational Surfaces", "statement": "The v1.1 corpus specifies a Tauri/Rust/React/SQLite application, typed WorkpagePlan, deterministic renderer, local adapters, security, tests, packaging, and independent audit.", "state": "SPECIFIED", "scope": "Complete build pack.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P20-S01", "P20-S02", "P20-S03" ], "limitations": [ "Current application implementation state must be separately inspected." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p20-workpage-os" }, { "id": "P20-C02", "paperId": "p20-workpage-os", "paperTitle": "Answers Become Interfaces", "category": "Operational Surfaces", "statement": "The interactive nineteen-phase runbook is itself an implemented static Workpage with local progress and copyable prompts.", "state": "IMPLEMENTED", "scope": "HTML runbook artifact.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P20-S03", "P20-S04" ], "limitations": [ "Browser behavior should be verified in the institute integration." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p20-workpage-os" }, { "id": "P20-C03", "paperId": "p20-workpage-os", "paperTitle": "Answers Become Interfaces", "category": "Operational Surfaces", "statement": "Workpages improve task completion and resumption compared with prose answers.", "state": "AWAITING_LOCAL_RUN", "scope": "Matched user study.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P20-S01", "P20-S02" ], "limitations": [ "No accepted comparative user data is published." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p20-workpage-os" }, { "id": "P21-C01", "paperId": "p21-mce1-human-in-master-control", "paperTitle": "Human in Master Control", "category": "Constitutional Systems", "statement": "MCE-1 specifies a structurally complete synthetic economy contract including rights, needs, resources, work, claims, governance, appeals, concentration, ecology, external bridges, failure, and recovery.", "state": "SPECIFIED", "scope": "Normative system contract.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P21-S01" ], "limitations": [ "Specification completeness does not prove implementation or policy quality." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p21-mce1-human-in-master-control" }, { "id": "P21-C02", "paperId": "p21-mce1-human-in-master-control", "paperTitle": "Human in Master Control", "category": "Constitutional Systems", "statement": "The architecture keeps models outside final canonical authority and unappealable adjudication.", "state": "SPECIFIED", "scope": "Constitutional invariant.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P21-S01", "P21-S04" ], "limitations": [ "Must be enforced in implementation." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p21-mce1-human-in-master-control" }, { "id": "P22-C01", "paperId": "p22-glyph-desk", "paperTitle": "Chat · Plan · Make", "category": "Operational Systems", "statement": "Glyph Desk defines Chat, Plan, and Make as persistent synchronized lenses over one Project Core with explicit promotion and authority boundaries.", "state": "SPECIFIED", "scope": "Master product architecture.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P22-S01", "P22-S02" ], "limitations": [ "Unified production implementation remains to be verified." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p22-glyph-desk" }, { "id": "P22-C02", "paperId": "p22-glyph-desk", "paperTitle": "Chat · Plan · Make", "category": "Operational Systems", "statement": "Accepted and working results remain separate and providers operate through scoped bindings rather than owning project state.", "state": "SPECIFIED", "scope": "Non-destructive/provider-independent contract.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P22-S01", "P22-S03", "P22-S05" ], "limitations": [ "Connector implementations and migration require evidence." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p22-glyph-desk" }, { "id": "P22-C03", "paperId": "p22-glyph-desk", "paperTitle": "Chat · Plan · Make", "category": "Operational Systems", "statement": "Chat–Plan–Make reduces cognitive load and project errors compared with ordinary provider chats.", "state": "AWAITING_LOCAL_RUN", "scope": "Multi-session comparative study.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P22-S01", "P22-S04" ], "limitations": [ "No accepted user study is published." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p22-glyph-desk" }, { "id": "P23-C01", "paperId": "p23-haygent-deterministic-agents", "paperTitle": "Tools Holding an LLM", "category": "Agents & Execution", "statement": "The Haygent architecture specifies deterministic control flow, enforceable permissions, typed packets, evidence gates, bounded repair, and truthful halt.", "state": "SPECIFIED", "scope": "Haygent v1 contract.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P23-S01" ], "limitations": [ "A complete reference runtime and conformance receipt are not included in the public corpus." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p23-haygent-deterministic-agents" }, { "id": "P23-C02", "paperId": "p23-haygent-deterministic-agents", "paperTitle": "Tools Holding an LLM", "category": "Agents & Execution", "statement": "Evidence-gated completion can prevent a model completion assertion from becoming a PASS event.", "state": "VERIFIED_MECHANISM", "scope": "Receipt and gate patterns in donor systems.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P23-S01", "P23-S02", "P23-S03" ], "limitations": [ "End-to-end comparative false-PASS rates remain to be measured." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p23-haygent-deterministic-agents" }, { "id": "P24-C01", "paperId": "p24-microscope-resolution-frontier", "paperTitle": "Resolution Frontier Search", "category": "Interpretability", "statement": "The supplied MicroScope Phase 5 system implements candidate search with ablation, restoration, neighbor controls, benchmark families, a Resolution Map, and evidence bundles.", "state": "IMPLEMENTED", "scope": "Supported local model environment and Phase 5 code/evidence.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P24-S01", "P24-S02" ], "limitations": [ "Independent reproduction and broader model coverage remain outstanding." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p24-microscope-resolution-frontier" }, { "id": "P24-C02", "paperId": "p24-microscope-resolution-frontier", "paperTitle": "Resolution Frontier Search", "category": "Interpretability", "statement": "A high-ranked candidate identifies a unique minimal causal circuit.", "state": "HYPOTHESIS", "scope": "Future mechanism-resolution research.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P24-S01" ], "limitations": [ "Current greedy and narrow probes do not establish uniqueness or minimality." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p24-microscope-resolution-frontier" }, { "id": "P25-C01", "paperId": "p25-continuity-core", "paperTitle": "Continuity Core", "category": "Continuity & Canon", "statement": "The corpus specifies stable concept identity, aliases, supersession, automatic checkpoints, source-authority separation, and project resurrection as an account-level continuity layer.", "state": "SPECIFIED", "scope": "Continuity Core architecture.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P25-S01", "P25-S02", "P25-S03" ], "limitations": [ "No single integrated account-level runtime receipt is published." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p25-continuity-core" }, { "id": "P25-C02", "paperId": "p25-continuity-core", "paperTitle": "Continuity Core", "category": "Continuity & Canon", "statement": "A reconstruction from canonical events can recover project orientation more accurately than provider transcript recall alone.", "state": "HYPOTHESIS", "scope": "Fragmented multi-provider projects.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P25-S01", "P25-S02" ], "limitations": [ "Requires controlled recovery benchmark." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p25-continuity-core" }, { "id": "P26-C01", "paperId": "p26-glyph-tokens", "paperTitle": "Glyph Tokens", "category": "Semantic Protocols", "statement": "The Glyph Token corpus specifies a typed semantic graph for source, authority, conditions, constraints, substitution, uncertainty, evidence, and action.", "state": "SPECIFIED", "scope": "Cross-product intermediate representation.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P26-S01", "P26-S02", "P26-S03", "P26-S04" ], "limitations": [ "A single public conformance implementation is not yet receipted." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p26-glyph-tokens" }, { "id": "P26-C02", "paperId": "p26-glyph-tokens", "paperTitle": "Glyph Tokens", "category": "Semantic Protocols", "statement": "Typed graphs can reduce silent substitution and authority confusion when downstream runtimes enforce token contracts.", "state": "HYPOTHESIS", "scope": "Governed project execution.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P26-S01", "P26-S02" ], "limitations": [ "Requires matched downstream task evaluation." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p26-glyph-tokens" }, { "id": "P27-C01", "paperId": "p27-spatial-home-as-state", "paperTitle": "Place That Means Something", "category": "Spatial & Social Systems", "statement": "The Glyphd Home corpus specifies a spatial projection contract based on aliveness, provenance-decoration, declared presence, threshold consent, and protected alternate projections.", "state": "SPECIFIED", "scope": "Glyphd V1 Home architecture.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P27-S01", "P27-S02", "P27-S03" ], "limitations": [ "Integrated production runtime is not yet evidenced here." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p27-spatial-home-as-state" }, { "id": "P27-C02", "paperId": "p27-spatial-home-as-state", "paperTitle": "Place That Means Something", "category": "Spatial & Social Systems", "statement": "Place-declared state improves ownership, work yield, comprehension, and voluntary sharing over matched non-architectural projections.", "state": "HYPOTHESIS", "scope": "Matched Home projection experiment.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P27-S01" ], "limitations": [ "Controlled user evidence has not been published." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p27-spatial-home-as-state" }, { "id": "P28-C01", "paperId": "p28-production-packets-generative-media", "paperTitle": "Do Not Just Output Prompts", "category": "Visual Systems", "statement": "The corpus implements and specifies production packets, plan-graph approval, production-skill registries, and ordered Omni reference sheets.", "state": "IMPLEMENTED", "scope": "X-Splora and template prototypes.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P28-S01", "P28-S02", "P28-S03", "P28-S04" ], "limitations": [ "Provider-specific integration and accepted-result evidence vary by prototype." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p28-production-packets-generative-media" }, { "id": "P28-C02", "paperId": "p28-production-packets-generative-media", "paperTitle": "Do Not Just Output Prompts", "category": "Visual Systems", "statement": "Production packets reduce repair cost and improve sequence adherence over one-prompt workflows.", "state": "HYPOTHESIS", "scope": "Matched generative-video experiments.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P28-S01", "P28-S03", "P28-S04" ], "limitations": [ "No broad controlled provider matrix is published." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p28-production-packets-generative-media" }, { "id": "P29-C01", "paperId": "p29-ambient-integration-web", "paperTitle": "Disjointed, Yet Joined", "category": "Agents & Coordination", "statement": "The existing web already implements separable mechanisms for machine-readable change publication, event distribution, capability description, automated update proposals, desired-state reconciliation, federation, agent interoperability, scoped authorization, and provenance.", "state": "SOURCE_REVIEWED", "scope": "Historical and technical synthesis of primary standards and official implementation documentation.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P29-S02", "P29-S03", "P29-S04", "P29-S05", "P29-S06", "P29-S07", "P29-S08", "P29-S09", "P29-S10", "P29-S11", "P29-S12", "P29-S13", "P29-S14" ], "limitations": [ "The sources establish individual mechanisms, not their composition into one project-level system.", "Deployment breadth and implementation quality vary across mechanisms." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p29-ambient-integration-web" }, { "id": "P29-C02", "paperId": "p29-ambient-integration-web", "paperTitle": "Disjointed, Yet Joined", "category": "Agents & Coordination", "statement": "A Project Constitution, mission-aware Scout, bounded Adapter Forge, Verification Packet, human proposal gate, and canonical receipt form a coherent architecture for ambient integration among independently governed projects.", "state": "SPECIFIED", "scope": "Proposed Ambient Integration Web architecture.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P29-S01", "P29-S15", "P29-S16", "P29-S17", "P29-S18", "P29-S19" ], "limitations": [ "The composition has not been implemented or independently interoperated.", "The specification does not yet define a stable wire format or conformance suite." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p29-ambient-integration-web" }, { "id": "P29-C03", "paperId": "p29-ambient-integration-web", "paperTitle": "Disjointed, Yet Joined", "category": "Agents & Coordination", "statement": "Mission-aware project scouts can discover useful capabilities outside a project's known dependency graph with acceptable precision, privacy, cost, and review burden.", "state": "HYPOTHESIS", "scope": "Open-world opportunity discovery.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P29-S01", "P29-S05", "P29-S06", "P29-S10", "P29-S11" ], "limitations": [ "No accepted opportunity-discovery benchmark has been run.", "Formalized project purpose may omit context and create false matches.", "Review burden may erase the expected benefit." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p29-ambient-integration-web" }, { "id": "P29-C04", "paperId": "p29-ambient-integration-web", "paperTitle": "Disjointed, Yet Joined", "category": "Agents & Coordination", "statement": "Permissionless capability publication combined with local project authority can produce functional integration without shared ownership or a formal bilateral partnership.", "state": "HYPOTHESIS", "scope": "Institutional and network effect of the proposed web.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P29-S03", "P29-S04", "P29-S09", "P29-S11", "P29-S12" ], "limitations": [ "Legal terms, authentication, support, liability, and data access may still require formal relationships.", "Unofficial compatibility may be fragile or unsupported." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p29-ambient-integration-web" }, { "id": "P29-C05", "paperId": "p29-ambient-integration-web", "paperTitle": "Disjointed, Yet Joined", "category": "Agents & Coordination", "statement": "As machine systems assume more discovery, construction, testing, and maintenance, the human operator's primary role shifts toward authoring purpose, setting boundaries, judging exceptions, accepting consequences, preserving plurality, and retaining revocation authority.", "state": "HYPOTHESIS", "scope": "Human role under increased project-level automation.", "evidenceRefs": [ "P29-S01", "P29-S17", "P29-S18", "P29-S19" ], "limitations": [ "The proposed role varies by domain, institution, law, and operator capacity.", "Human approval can become ceremonial if interfaces create false confidence.", "Collective and institutional governance may replace a single operator." ], "public": true, "visibility": "PUBLIC", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p29-ambient-integration-web" }, { "id": "WITHHELD-P05-1", "paperId": "p05-glyphcas", "paperTitle": "GlyphCAS", "category": "Identity & Reuse", "statement": "Withheld at the public disclosure boundary.", "state": null, "scope": "The publication registry counts this claim, but its claim ledger marks the record nonpublic.", "evidenceRefs": [], "limitations": [ "Statement, evidence state, evidence references, and enabling detail are not published." ], "public": false, "visibility": "WITHHELD", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p05-glyphcas" }, { "id": "WITHHELD-P10-1", "paperId": "p10-ooc-fold2", "paperTitle": "A Provenance-Routed Regenerative Object Codec", "category": "Compression & Representation", "statement": "Withheld at the public disclosure boundary.", "state": null, "scope": "The publication registry counts this claim, but its claim ledger marks the record nonpublic.", "evidenceRefs": [], "limitations": [ "Statement, evidence state, evidence references, and enabling detail are not published." ], "public": false, "visibility": "WITHHELD", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p10-ooc-fold2" }, { "id": "WITHHELD-P21-1", "paperId": "p21-mce1-human-in-master-control", "paperTitle": "Human in Master Control", "category": "Constitutional Systems", "statement": "Withheld at the public disclosure boundary.", "state": null, "scope": "The publication registry counts this claim, but its claim ledger marks the record nonpublic.", "evidenceRefs": [], "limitations": [ "Statement, evidence state, evidence references, and enabling detail are not published." ], "public": false, "visibility": "WITHHELD", "url": "https://glyphd.com/papers/p21-mce1-human-in-master-control" } ], "evidence": [ { "id": "E-SCHEMASTACK-LIVE-390", "title": "SchemaStack Signal Gate live audit", "state": "REPRODUCED", "scope": "390 completed local Ollama rows across three models, five modes, and three small benchmark families.", "limitations": [ "Small sample.", "XSTest and OR-Bench inputs are seed subsets, not full official datasets.", "No general safety conclusion is supported." ], "relatedBenchmarks": [ "b07-schemastack-signal-gate" ], "relatedPapers": [ "p16-schemastack-signal-gate" ], "publicArtifacts": [ { "path": "/evidence/schemastack/summary.json", "url": "https://glyphd.com/evidence/schemastack/summary.json" }, { "path": "/evidence/schemastack/live-audit-390.public-metrics.json", "url": "https://glyphd.com/evidence/schemastack/live-audit-390.public-metrics.json" }, { "path": "/evidence/schemastack/BENCHMARK_SUMMARY.md", "url": "https://glyphd.com/evidence/schemastack/BENCHMARK_SUMMARY.md" }, { "path": "/evidence/schemastack/VALIDITY_STATUS.md", "url": "https://glyphd.com/evidence/schemastack/VALIDITY_STATUS.md" }, { "path": "/evidence/schemastack/KNOWN_LIMITATIONS.md", "url": "https://glyphd.com/evidence/schemastack/KNOWN_LIMITATIONS.md" }, { "path": "/evidence/schemastack/source-hashes.json", "url": "https://glyphd.com/evidence/schemastack/source-hashes.json" } ], "sourceSha256": "05b5797fe9c8648460578eb0834ddba29f88415e443dbacfd79bffeb9585caeb" }, { "id": "E-FOVEA-PROOF-DECK-AUDIT", "title": "GlyphDrive/FOVEA proof-deck independent verification", "state": "VERIFIED_MECHANISM", "scope": "Reproduced 12/12 shipped self-tests and responsive/browser checks; independent audit also found open proof and security defects.", "limitations": [ "Green fold verification was self-hashed rather than checked against a pinned receipt.", "Same-frame restore was not actually proven.", "Long address arithmetic and unescaped input were release blockers in the audited deck." ], "relatedBenchmarks": [ "b01-fovea-correctness-cognition", "b02-fold2-codec-laboratory" ], "relatedPapers": [ "p03-fovea-address-fabric", "p10-ooc-fold2" ], "publicArtifacts": [ { "path": "/evidence/fovea/independent-verification.md", "url": "https://glyphd.com/evidence/fovea/independent-verification.md" } ], "sourceSha256": "1fc7c2a9bb9abe857c78ac4967145dc2a88257476b7cb1e6a7078ec7377e8334" }, { "id": "E-MICROSCOPE-PHASE5", "title": "MicroScope Resolution Frontier Phase 5 checkpoint", "state": "IMPLEMENTED", "scope": "Checkpoint records baseline, ablation, restoration, neighbor control, benchmark-family, metric, UI, and export implementation.", "limitations": [ "CRS ordering and compressibility proxy remain speculative.", "No unique-circuit or closed-provider causal claim is supported." ], "relatedBenchmarks": [ "b11-microscope-causal-ladders" ], "relatedPapers": [ "p24-microscope-resolution-frontier" ], "publicArtifacts": [ { "path": "/evidence/microscope/phase5-checkpoint.md", "url": "https://glyphd.com/evidence/microscope/phase5-checkpoint.md" } ], "sourceSha256": "8734c9eb0a3cee184dc2716f35a4297d177e29432d027f8f1bc2653156e7fd5d" }, { "id": "E-EL-JEFFE-PHASE0", "title": "EL-JEFFE 4B specification and Phase 0 control package", "state": "IMPLEMENTED", "scope": "241-file specification/build-control package with schemas, gates, synthetic tests, and Phase 0 verification.", "limitations": [ "No trained checkpoint.", "No model-quality gate has passed.", "No production mobile runtime or comparative result is claimed." ], "relatedBenchmarks": [ "b06-jeffe-4b" ], "relatedPapers": [ "p15-el-jeffe-4b" ], "publicArtifacts": [ { "path": "/evidence/el-jeffe/README.md", "url": "https://glyphd.com/evidence/el-jeffe/README.md" }, { "path": "/evidence/el-jeffe/PHASE_0_VERIFICATION.md", "url": "https://glyphd.com/evidence/el-jeffe/PHASE_0_VERIFICATION.md" } ], "sourceSha256": "ab915fedfcace4342044ed06b69c09bfd3fb97f82650b7848f9cbbbb58c7a3a2" }, { "id": "E-WORKPAGE-V1.1", "title": "WorkPage OS v1.1 pressure-tested build pack", "state": "SOURCE_REVIEWED", "scope": "Specification, pressure test, nineteen-phase runbook, and build-first instructions.", "limitations": [ "The source pack is build-ready documentation, not a current completed desktop-application receipt." ], "relatedBenchmarks": [ "b09-workpage-os" ], "relatedPapers": [ "p20-workpage-os" ], "publicArtifacts": [], "sourceSha256": "faa452c6383f832f18dd72067f66a4757060100b1faf96fdd5f137d1c1ccad79" }, { "id": "E-GLYPHCAS-DESIGN-REPORT", "title": "GlyphCAS design report", "state": "SOURCE_REVIEWED", "scope": "Source report supporting the typed identity, deterministic canonicalization, reuse, and proof architecture.", "limitations": [ "The public paper does not establish universal canonicalization, universal cache reuse, or production latency gains.", "Source bytes remain behind the paper's public-disclosure boundary." ], "relatedBenchmarks": [ "b03-glyphcas" ], "relatedPapers": [ "p05-glyphcas" ], "publicArtifacts": [], "sourceSha256": "f134fa76e5cfdd4891f95eda97588a9dd08caac8df859b418390480e81adc65d" }, { "id": "E-FOVEA-OOC-ASSESSMENT", "title": "GlyphDrive/FOVEA/OOC technical assessment", "state": "SOURCE_REVIEWED", "scope": "Technical assessment and v0.2 research plan supporting narrow mechanism claims and explicit future gates.", "limitations": [ "Founder-local Rust conformance, full codec baselines, and cognition experiments remain unrun." ], "relatedBenchmarks": [ "b01-fovea-correctness-cognition", "b02-fold2-codec-laboratory", "b03-glyphcas" ], "relatedPapers": [ "p03-fovea-address-fabric", "p05-glyphcas", "p10-ooc-fold2" ], "publicArtifacts": [], "sourceSha256": "27b2000b5b63449b0cbaf0f8e757a0af725f70df0213a27123b75320ea0cc03d" } ], "benchmarks": [ { "id": "b01-fovea-correctness-cognition", "number": "B01", "title": "FOVEA Correctness and Cognition", "version": "1.0.0", "relatedPaper": "p03-fovea-address-fabric", "relatedResearch": null, "requiredSuites": [ "Address golden vectors", "Parent/child/neighbor property tests", "Hilbert encode/decode and locality", "LOOK determinism and restore", "Atlas deletion and reconstruction", "Proof-breach rendering", "Bytes/tokens moved versus competent lazy loading", "Landmarked field versus plain grid versus search" ], "metrics": [ "exactness", "reconstruction agreement", "bytes_moved", "tokens_moved", "time_to_refind", "navigation_errors", "peripheral_cue_use", "user_preference" ], "invalidConditions": [ "incorrect address arithmetic", "address churn", "trusted unfold without receipt", "projection cache treated as truth", "unreceipted benchmark configuration" ], "resultState": "DETERMINISTIC_FIXTURE_CONFORMANCE", "performanceResult": false, "measuredMetrics": false, "contractSha256": "ce4cf35034e5c8d7af55ff25084951253a3caa94cc17fe606b483fbcd6af8a87", "note": "This receipt validates the benchmark contract fixture only. It is not a benchmark run and contains no performance or comparative result.", "url": "https://glyphd.com/benchmarks/b01-fovea-correctness-cognition" }, { "id": "b02-fold2-codec-laboratory", "number": "B02", "title": "fold/2 Codec Laboratory", "version": "1.0.0", "relatedPaper": "p10-ooc-fold2", "relatedResearch": null, "requiredSuites": [ "Deterministic serialization and golden vectors", "P/D/M/R/G exact round trips", "One-byte corruption", "Missing dependency and fallback", "Warm, amortized, and cold-start accounting", "zstd/Brotli/xz/delta/media-native baselines", "Generated and versioned corpora reported separately", "Encode/decode time, memory, random access" ], "metrics": [ "object_bytes", "amortized_recoverability_bytes", "cold_start_bytes", "encode_ms", "decode_ms", "peak_memory", "random_access_ms", "fallback_rate", "exactness" ], "invalidConditions": [ "silent corruption", "hidden dependency bytes", "strawman baseline", "route selected without self-decode verification", "mixed exact and perceptual result" ], "resultState": "DETERMINISTIC_FIXTURE_CONFORMANCE", "performanceResult": false, "measuredMetrics": false, "contractSha256": "9da6b85005e26fb90b34734c7f9ef8a283fe612cb682979d45295105c0b35b03", "note": "This receipt validates the benchmark contract fixture only. It is not a benchmark run and contains no performance or comparative result.", "url": "https://glyphd.com/benchmarks/b02-fold2-codec-laboratory" }, { "id": "b03-glyphcas", "number": "B03", "title": "GlyphCAS Identity and Reuse", "version": "1.0.0", "relatedPaper": "p05-glyphcas", "relatedResearch": null, "requiredSuites": [ "Exact blob and canonical subset", "Paraphrase semantic alias fixtures", "Project and authority isolation", "Dependency invalidation", "Receipt-chain verification", "Representation recipe verification", "Early-exit and full-inference fallback", "Adversarial false-reuse cases" ], "metrics": [ "exact_hit_rate", "semantic_reuse_precision", "false_reuse_rate", "compiler_ms", "lookup_ms", "full_inference_avoided", "invalidation_accuracy", "proof_recovery" ], "invalidConditions": [ "semantic candidate promoted to exact identity", "cross-project reuse without contract", "stale dependency accepted", "receipt chain break", "approximation unlabeled" ], "resultState": "DETERMINISTIC_FIXTURE_CONFORMANCE", "performanceResult": false, "measuredMetrics": false, "contractSha256": "497950762457ac9424e66dac032cdc0e524eadb90fb314ec5df7730fe3b7b89b", "note": "This receipt validates the benchmark contract fixture only. It is not a benchmark run and contains no performance or comparative result.", "url": "https://glyphd.com/benchmarks/b03-glyphcas" }, { "id": "b04-actor-agent-runtime", "number": "B04", "title": "Actor–Agent Runtime", "version": "1.0.0", "relatedPaper": "p06-actor-before-agent", "relatedResearch": null, "requiredSuites": [ "Dormant cost and scheduler eligibility", "Limited-knowledge isolation", "World Patch schema and bounds", "Identity continuity across restarts", "Belief versus fact handling", "Multiplex world pass", "Unauthorized mutation and hidden information", "Rollback and replay" ], "metrics": [ "unauthorized_mutation_rate", "knowledge_leak_rate", "patch_validity", "identity_continuity", "calls_per_actor_event", "replay_agreement", "rollback_success" ], "invalidConditions": [ "direct capsule mutation", "unknown fact leakage", "unexplained identity reversal", "cooldown bypass", "revision without provenance" ], "resultState": "DETERMINISTIC_FIXTURE_CONFORMANCE", "performanceResult": false, "measuredMetrics": false, "contractSha256": "be9102199aea4344d76f9ac001d62e2af59e0ad6b750e825043a9952f44524af", "note": "This receipt validates the benchmark contract fixture only. It is not a benchmark run and contains no performance or comparative result.", "url": "https://glyphd.com/benchmarks/b04-actor-agent-runtime" }, { "id": "b05-surfacedelta-uplift", "number": "B05", "title": "SurfaceDelta Matched-Condition Uplift", "version": "1.0.0", "relatedPaper": "p07-surfacemind-surfacedelta", "relatedResearch": null, "requiredSuites": [ "Same source, task, model, quantization, and hardware", "Raw prose versus full structured page versus SurfaceDelta", "Strict citation verification", "Bounded repair", "Time to first useful verified content", "Blinded usefulness", "Energy and thermals where available" ], "metrics": [ "schema_validity", "mean_repairs", "citation_verified_or_flagged", "tokens_in", "tokens_out", "ttft_verified_ms", "wall_ms", "energy_j", "blinded_usefulness" ], "invalidConditions": [ "different prompt evidence", "model or quantization mismatch", "citation verifier disabled", "unbounded repair", "usefulness judged with condition labels visible" ], "resultState": "DETERMINISTIC_FIXTURE_CONFORMANCE", "performanceResult": false, "measuredMetrics": false, "contractSha256": "a819e2d879c35193ebb46d26add48a60f9732a4fce92c4780473c4c6c7eaf4da", "note": "This receipt validates the benchmark contract fixture only. It is not a benchmark run and contains no performance or comparative result.", "url": "https://glyphd.com/benchmarks/b05-surfacedelta-uplift" }, { "id": "b06-jeffe-4b", "number": "B06", "title": "EL-JEFFE 4B Model and Runtime Gates", "version": "1.0.0", "relatedPaper": "p15-el-jeffe-4b", "relatedResearch": null, "requiredSuites": [ "Authority, modality, scope, and substitution", "Constraint retention", "Evidence discipline", "Routing, abstention, and escalation", "Structured action generation", "Private retrieval", "Mobile latency, memory, thermals, and battery", "Independent reproduction" ], "metrics": [ "authority_accuracy", "substitution_error", "constraint_retention", "evidence_accuracy", "routing_accuracy", "unauthorized_actions", "latency", "memory", "energy", "thermal_sustain" ], "invalidConditions": [ "example synthetic metrics called achieved", "weights or tokenizer unpinned", "runtime policy credited to checkpoint", "unauthorized action", "comparative claim without independent run" ], "resultState": "DETERMINISTIC_FIXTURE_CONFORMANCE", "performanceResult": false, "measuredMetrics": false, "contractSha256": "fdd6dd1183866bfec2d8d7390dd0ddf170281be6730c2066d99282b0c7f62867", "note": "This receipt validates the benchmark contract fixture only. It is not a benchmark run and contains no performance or comparative result.", "url": "https://glyphd.com/benchmarks/b06-jeffe-4b" }, { "id": "b07-schemastack-signal-gate", "number": "B07", "title": "SchemaStack Signal Gate", "version": "1.0.0", "relatedPaper": "p16-schemastack-signal-gate", "relatedResearch": null, "requiredSuites": [ "Raw, static, repair, Signal Gate, and Signal Gate repair", "SchemaBench stratified samples", "XSTest and OR-Bench with exact dataset identity", "Artifact-aware refusal scoring", "Leakage detection", "Actionability and expression disposition", "Per-model and per-mode reporting" ], "metrics": [ "task_pass", "safety_pass", "schema_selection_accuracy", "leakage_pass", "false_refusal_rate", "unsafe_compliance_rate", "wrong_frame_rate", "schema_leakage_rate", "latency", "output_length" ], "invalidConditions": [ "Ollama preflight fail", "100% transport error in any mode", "mock rows labeled live", "empty responses", "leakage detector disabled", "seed subset labeled full dataset" ], "resultState": "DETERMINISTIC_FIXTURE_CONFORMANCE", "performanceResult": false, "measuredMetrics": false, "contractSha256": "13c3ed120edde82c3c56f555453684a4d58dd05ee2701deaaaf72f4ea2d8da7d", "note": "This receipt validates the benchmark contract fixture only. It is not a benchmark run and contains no performance or comparative result.", "url": "https://glyphd.com/benchmarks/b07-schemastack-signal-gate" }, { "id": "b08-attention-cursor", "number": "B08", "title": "Attention Cursor / Referential Return", "version": "1.0.0", "relatedPaper": "p17-attention-cursor", "relatedResearch": null, "requiredSuites": [ "Consented participant protocol", "Nomination versus explicit commitment", "Ambiguous multi-object scenes", "Manual fallback", "Correction and cancellation", "Privacy-disabled condition", "Device and lighting variation" ], "metrics": [ "nomination_accuracy", "false_commit_rate", "correction_time", "task_time", "cognitive_load", "manual_fallback_success", "privacy_comprehension" ], "invalidConditions": [ "nomination treated as action", "no explicit consent", "no correction path", "private video retained beyond protocol", "manual path absent" ], "resultState": "DETERMINISTIC_FIXTURE_CONFORMANCE", "performanceResult": false, "measuredMetrics": false, "contractSha256": "8fc94165127a4d9c83af816670654a4127aaacb82e01681236d4797f8941239f", "note": "This receipt validates the benchmark contract fixture only. It is not a benchmark run and contains no performance or comparative result.", "url": "https://glyphd.com/benchmarks/b08-attention-cursor" }, { "id": "b09-workpage-os", "number": "B09", "title": "WorkPage OS Task Completion", "version": "1.0.0", "relatedPaper": "p20-workpage-os", "relatedResearch": null, "requiredSuites": [ "WorkpagePlan validation", "All page archetypes", "Standalone export behavior", "Preview isolation", "Local provider adapters", "Task completion versus prose instructions", "Progress recovery and evidence quality", "Security and accessibility" ], "metrics": [ "task_completion", "time_to_first_action", "time_to_completion", "recovery_success", "evidence_completeness", "revision_count", "unsafe_action_rejection", "accessibility_violations" ], "invalidConditions": [ "remote scripts in export", "secret appears in renderer or export", "completion without evidence", "generated command auto-executed", "provider unavailable called success" ], "resultState": "DETERMINISTIC_FIXTURE_CONFORMANCE", "performanceResult": false, "measuredMetrics": false, "contractSha256": "cc27e39054df93788b2a3ab20f7d5f6156907bc8a741278b19a3cc1ae48dea0a", "note": "This receipt validates the benchmark contract fixture only. It is not a benchmark run and contains no performance or comparative result.", "url": "https://glyphd.com/benchmarks/b09-workpage-os" }, { "id": "b10-haygent-bounded-agent-correctness", "number": "B10", "title": "Haygent Bounded-Agent Correctness", "version": "1.0.0", "relatedPaper": "p23-haygent-deterministic-agents", "relatedResearch": null, "requiredSuites": [ "Manifest and contract conformance", "Permission denial and target jail", "Immutable packets and chain", "Evidence gates", "Bounded repairs", "Truthful HALT", "Replay and idempotency", "Comparison with free-agent loop" ], "metrics": [ "false_pass_rate", "unauthorized_operation_rate", "packet_validity", "evidence_completeness", "repair_convergence", "replay_agreement", "verified_completion_time", "useful_halt_score" ], "invalidConditions": [ "false PASS", "self-expanded permission", "report diverges from ledger", "repair budget reset", "out-of-scope work accepted" ], "resultState": "DETERMINISTIC_FIXTURE_CONFORMANCE", "performanceResult": false, "measuredMetrics": false, "contractSha256": "e5e1f6a1c14aa0ee476f3f5171a38c440d9402a652b8dbeaa29fed4079e50245", "note": "This receipt validates the benchmark contract fixture only. It is not a benchmark run and contains no performance or comparative result.", "url": "https://glyphd.com/benchmarks/b10-haygent-bounded-agent-correctness" }, { "id": "b11-microscope-causal-ladders", "number": "B11", "title": "MicroScope Causal Ladders", "version": "1.0.0", "relatedPaper": "p24-microscope-resolution-frontier", "relatedResearch": null, "requiredSuites": [ "Pinned local model and tokenizer", "Baseline, ablation, restoration, neighbor control", "Prompt benchmark families", "Tensor and intervention export", "Metric decomposition", "Composite-weight sensitivity", "Independent rerun" ], "metrics": [ "lis", "sss", "restoration_fidelity", "neighbor_control", "prompt_stability", "rank_stability", "reproduction_agreement" ], "invalidConditions": [ "target misalignment", "restoration omitted", "control omitted", "single prompt called general", "rank called causal truth", "closed-provider claim" ], "resultState": "DETERMINISTIC_FIXTURE_CONFORMANCE", "performanceResult": false, "measuredMetrics": false, "contractSha256": "75855cfdb658f61936dfa4507fc822357a54dac26ab6a1c37e7de4659279f65a", "note": "This receipt validates the benchmark contract fixture only. It is not a benchmark run and contains no performance or comparative result.", "url": "https://glyphd.com/benchmarks/b11-microscope-causal-ladders" }, { "id": "b12-continuity-recovery", "number": "B12", "title": "Continuity Core Recovery", "version": "1.0.0", "relatedPaper": "p25-continuity-core", "relatedResearch": null, "requiredSuites": [ "Renames and aliases", "Proposal versus decision", "Provider handoff", "Dormancy and resurrection", "Stale bindings", "Event-log reconstruction", "Corrupt projection cache", "Cross-project isolation" ], "metrics": [ "orientation_time", "accepted_decision_precision", "accepted_decision_recall", "proposal_as_decision_error", "binding_staleness_detection", "reopen_accuracy", "human_reconstruction_effort" ], "invalidConditions": [ "assistant proposal promoted as founder decision", "false concept merge", "private source crosses project", "stale deployment called current", "checkpoint becomes second truth" ], "resultState": "DETERMINISTIC_FIXTURE_CONFORMANCE", "performanceResult": false, "measuredMetrics": false, "contractSha256": "74c0382edd513e467728923e4a84e55052d70a5c7773aa81d6c97810f1601cb3", "note": "This receipt validates the benchmark contract fixture only. It is not a benchmark run and contains no performance or comparative result.", "url": "https://glyphd.com/benchmarks/b12-continuity-recovery" }, { "id": "b13-glyph-token-compilation", "number": "B13", "title": "Glyph Token Compilation", "version": "1.0.0", "relatedPaper": "p26-glyph-tokens", "relatedResearch": null, "requiredSuites": [ "Messy dictation and corrections", "Source-span alignment", "Authority and modality", "Conditions and substitutions", "Uncertainty preservation", "Macro expansion", "Downstream Work Order compilation", "Adversarial authority spoofing" ], "metrics": [ "span_accuracy", "token_type_accuracy", "authority_accuracy", "constraint_retention", "substitution_detection", "graph_validity", "repair_count", "downstream_task_success" ], "invalidConditions": [ "unsupported token accepted", "hidden substitution", "source span mismatch", "model mints authority", "recursive macro bomb", "stale approval replay" ], "resultState": "DETERMINISTIC_FIXTURE_CONFORMANCE", "performanceResult": false, "measuredMetrics": false, "contractSha256": "d215adb3e2a3fd0b95ef40845472efbd99a8be12b07545392b6e76989d544c79", "note": "This receipt validates the benchmark contract fixture only. It is not a benchmark run and contains no performance or comparative result.", "url": "https://glyphd.com/benchmarks/b13-glyph-token-compilation" }, { "id": "b14-spatial-home-behavior", "number": "B14", "title": "Spatial Home Behavior", "version": "1.0.0", "relatedPaper": "p27-spatial-home-as-state", "relatedResearch": null, "requiredSuites": [ "Architectural Home versus radial/Workfield/Corolla", "Identical Project state and tasks", "StateIntent use", "Real Returns", "Voluntary Door sharing", "Permission comprehension", "Projection switching", "Accessible fallback" ], "metrics": [ "meaningful_state_intents", "sessions_with_return", "voluntary_door_shares", "resume_time", "work_order_time", "navigation_errors", "permission_comprehension", "projection_switches" ], "invalidConditions": [ "fake activity", "default-public Door", "better model in one condition", "sharing incentive contaminates measure", "no list/keyboard equivalent" ], "resultState": "DETERMINISTIC_FIXTURE_CONFORMANCE", "performanceResult": false, "measuredMetrics": false, "contractSha256": "670bde53f6133476466656a4e5b15ce7c2dc29cd0775260e3a8e7bf90a6f40d4", "note": "This receipt validates the benchmark contract fixture only. It is not a benchmark run and contains no performance or comparative result.", "url": "https://glyphd.com/benchmarks/b14-spatial-home-behavior" }, { "id": "b15-production-packet-adherence", "number": "B15", "title": "Production Packet and Omni Adherence", "version": "1.0.0", "relatedPaper": "p28-production-packets-generative-media", "relatedResearch": null, "requiredSuites": [ "One prompt versus compiled packet", "Fixed subject and provider", "Panel count/order/layout isolation", "Reference role adherence", "Plan comprehension", "First-pass usability", "Repair count and cost", "Provider-specific reporting" ], "metrics": [ "beat_order_accuracy", "camera_path_adherence", "landing_frame_adherence", "identity_continuity", "constraint_violations", "first_pass_usability", "repairs_to_accept", "cost_to_accept" ], "invalidConditions": [ "different creative intent across conditions", "unrecorded provider settings", "human judge unblinded", "failed render omitted", "illustrative cost called actual" ], "resultState": "DETERMINISTIC_FIXTURE_CONFORMANCE", "performanceResult": false, "measuredMetrics": false, "contractSha256": "90b51e8dd185902a09fe8f0b34acf7d86ac41ee7ea868472f2593069cf5ca54c", "note": "This receipt validates the benchmark contract fixture only. It is not a benchmark run and contains no performance or comparative result.", "url": "https://glyphd.com/benchmarks/b15-production-packet-adherence" }, { "id": "b16-rtin-structural-partitioning", "number": "B16", "title": "RTIN Structural Partitioning and Recursive Resolution", "version": "1.0.0", "relatedPaper": "p13-fractal-llm-computation", "relatedResearch": "recursive-tripartite-inference-network", "requiredSuites": [ "Single-pass and same-context plan-and-answer baselines", "Linear TSP with raw-text handoff", "Linear TSP with compact-summary handoff", "Linear TSP with schema-validated typed-state handoff", "One-level recursive TSP with reversible Resolution Packets", "Matched-total-compute comparison", "Matched-peak-memory comparison", "Evidence recoverability and false-completion challenge set", "Cross-model and same-model role ablations" ], "metrics": [ "requirement_coverage", "completion_test_pass_rate", "source_fidelity", "unsupported_claim_rate", "contradiction_rate", "false_completion_rate", "artifact_validity", "evidence_recoverability", "open_loop_preservation", "cross_child_consistency", "input_tokens_total", "output_tokens_total", "model_invocations", "peak_vram_bytes", "wall_time_ms", "orchestration_time_ms", "energy_joules", "estimated_cost_usd", "recursive_depth", "child_cells", "merge_conflicts", "evidence_escalations", "cache_hit_rate" ], "invalidConditions": [ "different source material or task instructions across conditions", "unreported model, tokenizer, quantization, runtime, or prompt changes", "unbounded recursion, repair, or verifier calls", "counting fixture conformance as measured model performance", "excluding failed child calls, retrieval, verification, or orchestration from cost", "using benchmark tasks to tune prompts or recursion thresholds without disclosure", "judging quality with condition labels visible", "missing raw task rows, receipts, or source-reference recovery traces" ], "resultState": "DETERMINISTIC_FIXTURE_CONFORMANCE", "performanceResult": false, "measuredMetrics": false, "contractSha256": "898c16a4a2a682285e667585d5bc189801b0b8c54809c7dac1e86bfdd86a644a", "note": "This receipt validates the benchmark contract fixture only. It is not a benchmark run and contains no performance or comparative result.", "url": "https://glyphd.com/benchmarks/b16-rtin-structural-partitioning" } ], "instruments": [ { "id": "d01-truth-plane-lens-plane", "number": "D01", "title": "Truth Plane / Lens Plane", "relatedPaper": "p04-memory-is-not-the-lens", "relatedBenchmark": "b01-fovea-correctness-cognition", "assertions": [ "Deleting all view state loses zero canonical events.", "A stale projection is visibly labeled and cannot commit.", "Rejected candidate leaves the canonical head unchanged.", "Accepted candidate appends an event and produces a receipt." ], "requiredViewports": [ { "width": 360, "height": 800 }, { "width": 768, "height": 1024 }, { "width": 1440, "height": 1000 } ], "keyboardPath": true, "reducedMotion": true, "paidApiDefault": false, "teachingInstrument": true, "url": "https://glyphd.com/demos/d01-truth-plane-lens-plane" }, { "id": "d02-fovea-address-atlas", "number": "D02", "title": "FOVEA Address Atlas", "relatedPaper": "p03-fovea-address-fabric", "relatedBenchmark": "b01-fovea-correctness-cognition", "assertions": [ "Parent/child/neighbor operations match golden vectors.", "The same LookState produces the same logical frame.", "SpatialAddress never changes ContentId or logical identity.", "An unreceipted fold cannot display the trusted rim." ], "requiredViewports": [ { "width": 360, "height": 800 }, { "width": 768, "height": 1024 }, { "width": 1440, "height": 1000 } ], "keyboardPath": true, "reducedMotion": true, "paidApiDefault": false, "teachingInstrument": true, "url": "https://glyphd.com/demos/d02-fovea-address-atlas" }, { "id": "d03-glyphcas-identity-explorer", "number": "D03", "title": "GlyphCAS Identity Explorer", "relatedPaper": "p05-glyphcas", "relatedBenchmark": "b03-glyphcas", "assertions": [ "One-byte change changes exact ContentId.", "Project or authority change breaks contextual reuse.", "Dependency invalidation preserves immutable exact blobs.", "Approximate candidates never become exact identity." ], "requiredViewports": [ { "width": 360, "height": 800 }, { "width": 768, "height": 1024 }, { "width": 1440, "height": 1000 } ], "keyboardPath": true, "reducedMotion": true, "paidApiDefault": false, "teachingInstrument": true, "url": "https://glyphd.com/demos/d03-glyphcas-identity-explorer" }, { "id": "d04-fold2-proof-deck", "number": "D04", "title": "fold/2 Proof Deck", "relatedPaper": "p10-ooc-fold2", "relatedBenchmark": "b02-fold2-codec-laboratory", "assertions": [ "Every sealed exact route round-trips to ContentId.", "Corruption causes refusal or verified fallback.", "Cold-start accounting includes required models and dependencies.", "Router chooses P when a special route exceeds the allowed floor." ], "requiredViewports": [ { "width": 360, "height": 800 }, { "width": 768, "height": 1024 }, { "width": 1440, "height": 1000 } ], "keyboardPath": true, "reducedMotion": true, "paidApiDefault": false, "teachingInstrument": true, "url": "https://glyphd.com/demos/d04-fold2-proof-deck" }, { "id": "d05-actor-runtime-theater", "number": "D05", "title": "Actor Runtime Theater", "relatedPaper": "p06-actor-before-agent", "relatedBenchmark": "b04-actor-agent-runtime", "assertions": [ "Dormant actors consume no model call.", "Agent packet excludes unknown world facts.", "Agent cannot directly mutate Actor Capsule.", "Accepted operations increment revision and preserve provenance." ], "requiredViewports": [ { "width": 360, "height": 800 }, { "width": 768, "height": 1024 }, { "width": 1440, "height": 1000 } ], "keyboardPath": true, "reducedMotion": true, "paidApiDefault": false, "teachingInstrument": true, "url": "https://glyphd.com/demos/d05-actor-runtime-theater" }, { "id": "d06-surfacedelta-versus-prose", "number": "D06", "title": "SurfaceDelta Versus Prose", "relatedPaper": "p07-surfacemind-surfacedelta", "relatedBenchmark": "b05-surfacedelta-uplift", "assertions": [ "Every delta validates before render.", "Stale base rejects without partial mutation.", "Every quote is verified or visibly flagged.", "Metrics separate latency, output tokens, repairs, and usefulness." ], "requiredViewports": [ { "width": 360, "height": 800 }, { "width": 768, "height": 1024 }, { "width": 1440, "height": 1000 } ], "keyboardPath": true, "reducedMotion": true, "paidApiDefault": false, "teachingInstrument": true, "url": "https://glyphd.com/demos/d06-surfacedelta-versus-prose" }, { "id": "d07-cas-native-work-order", "number": "D07", "title": "CAS-Native Agent Work Order", "relatedPaper": "p09-cas-native-agent-coordination", "relatedBenchmark": "b03-glyphcas", "assertions": [ "Worker sees only scoped inputs.", "Dependency drift creates conflict instead of silent overwrite.", "Return is not Verification; Verification is not Acceptance.", "Replay resolves the same accepted head from exact records." ], "requiredViewports": [ { "width": 360, "height": 800 }, { "width": 768, "height": 1024 }, { "width": 1440, "height": 1000 } ], "keyboardPath": true, "reducedMotion": true, "paidApiDefault": false, "teachingInstrument": true, "url": "https://glyphd.com/demos/d07-cas-native-work-order" }, { "id": "d08-temporal-atlas", "number": "D08", "title": "Temporal Atlas / Video Address Map", "relatedPaper": "p11-content-addressable-video", "relatedBenchmark": "b02-fold2-codec-laboratory", "assertions": [ "Logical scene identity survives a shot replacement.", "Exact source range remains independently addressable.", "Branch edits do not rewrite the parent timeline.", "Continuity constraints are visible and testable." ], "requiredViewports": [ { "width": 360, "height": 800 }, { "width": 768, "height": 1024 }, { "width": 1440, "height": 1000 } ], "keyboardPath": true, "reducedMotion": true, "paidApiDefault": false, "teachingInstrument": true, "url": "https://glyphd.com/demos/d08-temporal-atlas" }, { "id": "d09-fractal-llm-locality", "number": "D09", "title": "Fractal LLM Locality Visualizer", "relatedPaper": "p13-fractal-llm-computation", "relatedBenchmark": "b05-surfacedelta-uplift", "assertions": [ "Evidence anchors cannot be pruned by a convenience threshold.", "Traversal changes order, not canonical node identity.", "Displayed cache/locality metrics are labeled proxies unless measured on hardware.", "Query selection exposes omitted nodes." ], "requiredViewports": [ { "width": 360, "height": 800 }, { "width": 768, "height": 1024 }, { "width": 1440, "height": 1000 } ], "keyboardPath": true, "reducedMotion": true, "paidApiDefault": false, "teachingInstrument": true, "url": "https://glyphd.com/demos/d09-fractal-llm-locality" }, { "id": "d10-route-m-flight-stream", "number": "D10", "title": "Route M-Flight Stream Router", "relatedPaper": "p14-route-m-flight", "relatedBenchmark": "b02-fold2-codec-laboratory", "assertions": [ "No segment seals before schema and exact digest validation.", "Encoder and decoder must derive bit-identical probability integers.", "One segment failure does not corrupt prior sealed segments.", "Raw fallback preserves recoverability." ], "requiredViewports": [ { "width": 360, "height": 800 }, { "width": 768, "height": 1024 }, { "width": 1440, "height": 1000 } ], "keyboardPath": true, "reducedMotion": true, "paidApiDefault": false, "teachingInstrument": true, "url": "https://glyphd.com/demos/d10-route-m-flight-stream" }, { "id": "d11-schemastack-result-explorer", "number": "D11", "title": "SchemaStack Result Explorer", "relatedPaper": "p16-schemastack-signal-gate", "relatedBenchmark": "b07-schemastack-signal-gate", "assertions": [ "Aggregate counts equal underlying filtered rows.", "Mock rows can never be labeled live.", "Seed subsets are visibly distinguished from full official datasets.", "Task and safety metrics remain separate." ], "requiredViewports": [ { "width": 360, "height": 800 }, { "width": 768, "height": 1024 }, { "width": 1440, "height": 1000 } ], "keyboardPath": true, "reducedMotion": true, "paidApiDefault": false, "teachingInstrument": true, "url": "https://glyphd.com/demos/d11-schemastack-result-explorer" }, { "id": "d12-attention-cursor", "number": "D12", "title": "Attention Cursor / Referential Return", "relatedPaper": "p17-attention-cursor", "relatedBenchmark": "b08-attention-cursor", "assertions": [ "Nomination never performs the action.", "Ambiguity remains visible.", "Correction updates the event without rewriting the original nomination.", "Disabled sensing yields a complete manual path." ], "requiredViewports": [ { "width": 360, "height": 800 }, { "width": 768, "height": 1024 }, { "width": 1440, "height": 1000 } ], "keyboardPath": true, "reducedMotion": true, "paidApiDefault": false, "teachingInstrument": true, "url": "https://glyphd.com/demos/d12-attention-cursor" }, { "id": "d13-context-corolla", "number": "D13", "title": "Glyphd Corolla", "relatedPaper": "p18-context-corolla", "relatedBenchmark": "b09-workpage-os", "assertions": [ "Every move records provenance.", "Lucky cannot perform an uncovered consequential action.", "List and keyboard fallback can perform the same state operations.", "Rotation never changes project truth." ], "requiredViewports": [ { "width": 360, "height": 800 }, { "width": 768, "height": 1024 }, { "width": 1440, "height": 1000 } ], "keyboardPath": true, "reducedMotion": true, "paidApiDefault": false, "teachingInstrument": true, "url": "https://glyphd.com/demos/d13-context-corolla" }, { "id": "d14-workpage-generator", "number": "D14", "title": "Workpage Generator", "relatedPaper": "p20-workpage-os", "relatedBenchmark": "b09-workpage-os", "assertions": [ "Arbitrary model HTML is not accepted in the main path.", "Export contains no remote scripts or secrets.", "Completion requires the page-specific evidence contract.", "Local progress survives reload and can export as JSON." ], "requiredViewports": [ { "width": 360, "height": 800 }, { "width": 768, "height": 1024 }, { "width": 1440, "height": 1000 } ], "keyboardPath": true, "reducedMotion": true, "paidApiDefault": false, "teachingInstrument": true, "url": "https://glyphd.com/demos/d14-workpage-generator" }, { "id": "d15-haygent-run-inspector", "number": "D15", "title": "Haygent Run Inspector", "relatedPaper": "p23-haygent-deterministic-agents", "relatedBenchmark": "b10-haygent-bounded-agent-correctness", "assertions": [ "Model cannot choose arbitrary next step.", "Denied operation is recorded and not bypassed.", "PASS derives from evidence, not report prose.", "Exhausted repair yields HALT with preserved artifacts." ], "requiredViewports": [ { "width": 360, "height": 800 }, { "width": 768, "height": 1024 }, { "width": 1440, "height": 1000 } ], "keyboardPath": true, "reducedMotion": true, "paidApiDefault": false, "teachingInstrument": true, "url": "https://glyphd.com/demos/d15-haygent-run-inspector" }, { "id": "d16-microscope-resolution-map", "number": "D16", "title": "MicroScope Resolution Map", "relatedPaper": "p24-microscope-resolution-frontier", "relatedBenchmark": "b11-microscope-causal-ladders", "assertions": [ "Composite rank never hides component metrics.", "Restoration and control evidence are required for promotion.", "Prompt-family identity is visible.", "Unique-circuit language is prohibited without stronger evidence." ], "requiredViewports": [ { "width": 360, "height": 800 }, { "width": 768, "height": 1024 }, { "width": 1440, "height": 1000 } ], "keyboardPath": true, "reducedMotion": true, "paidApiDefault": false, "teachingInstrument": true, "url": "https://glyphd.com/demos/d16-microscope-resolution-map" }, { "id": "d17-continuity-resurrection", "number": "D17", "title": "Continuity Core Resurrection", "relatedPaper": "p25-continuity-core", "relatedBenchmark": "b12-continuity-recovery", "assertions": [ "Assistant proposal is not returned as founder decision.", "Rename preserves concept lineage.", "Stale binding remains visible.", "Resurrection lists accepted, blocked, unknown, and next action separately." ], "requiredViewports": [ { "width": 360, "height": 800 }, { "width": 768, "height": 1024 }, { "width": 1440, "height": 1000 } ], "keyboardPath": true, "reducedMotion": true, "paidApiDefault": false, "teachingInstrument": true, "url": "https://glyphd.com/demos/d17-continuity-resurrection" }, { "id": "d18-glyph-token-compiler", "number": "D18", "title": "Glyph Token Compiler", "relatedPaper": "p26-glyph-tokens", "relatedBenchmark": "b13-glyph-token-compilation", "assertions": [ "Every source-backed token resolves to exact text.", "Model cannot mint founder authority.", "Blocked substitution cannot compile to executable action.", "Macro expansion is deterministic and bounded." ], "requiredViewports": [ { "width": 360, "height": 800 }, { "width": 768, "height": 1024 }, { "width": 1440, "height": 1000 } ], "keyboardPath": true, "reducedMotion": true, "paidApiDefault": false, "teachingInstrument": true, "url": "https://glyphd.com/demos/d18-glyph-token-compiler" }, { "id": "d19-spatial-home-projection-lab", "number": "D19", "title": "Spatial Home Projection Lab", "relatedPaper": "p27-spatial-home-as-state", "relatedBenchmark": "b14-spatial-home-behavior", "assertions": [ "Every projection resolves to the same objects and events.", "No ambient motion occurs without event state.", "Crossing a threshold exposes scope and revocation.", "Unavailable Station is truthful rather than animated as working." ], "requiredViewports": [ { "width": 360, "height": 800 }, { "width": 768, "height": 1024 }, { "width": 1440, "height": 1000 } ], "keyboardPath": true, "reducedMotion": true, "paidApiDefault": false, "teachingInstrument": true, "url": "https://glyphd.com/demos/d19-spatial-home-projection-lab" }, { "id": "d20-production-packet-compiler", "number": "D20", "title": "Production Packet Compiler", "relatedPaper": "p28-production-packets-generative-media", "relatedBenchmark": "b15-production-packet-adherence", "assertions": [ "Reference roles and order are explicit.", "Changing configuration does not execute or spend.", "Render path remains blocked before approval.", "Repair packet names exact violations and preserves accepted references." ], "requiredViewports": [ { "width": 360, "height": 800 }, { "width": 768, "height": 1024 }, { "width": 1440, "height": 1000 } ], "keyboardPath": true, "reducedMotion": true, "paidApiDefault": false, "teachingInstrument": true, "url": "https://glyphd.com/demos/d20-production-packet-compiler" }, { "id": "d21-spark-dex-manifestation-runtime", "number": "D21", "title": "Spark-Dex Manifestation Runtime", "relatedPaper": "p01-manifestation-gap", "relatedBenchmark": "b05-surfacedelta-uplift", "assertions": [ "Generated completion language does not change the Manifest.", "Materialization is recorded separately from verification.", "A later file mutation invalidates prior evidence.", "Unsupported completion is refused rather than silently promoted." ], "requiredViewports": [ { "width": 360, "height": 800 }, { "width": 768, "height": 1024 }, { "width": 1440, "height": 1000 } ], "keyboardPath": true, "reducedMotion": true, "paidApiDefault": false, "teachingInstrument": true, "url": "https://glyphd.com/demos/d21-spark-dex-manifestation-runtime" }, { "id": "d22-completion-gradient-protocol", "number": "D22", "title": "Hayden's Elite Workflow Method", "relatedPaper": "p01-manifestation-gap", "relatedBenchmark": "b09-workpage-os", "assertions": [ "A percentage is meaningful only relative to an explicit completion contract.", "The remaining gradient becomes questions rather than hidden model assumptions.", "Answer-based closure occurs before critique disclosure.", "The memory-rich primary intelligence adjudicates rather than obeys the cold-start critique.", "AI stops at 99% project completion; only human acceptance commits DONE." ], "requiredViewports": [ { "width": 360, "height": 800 }, { "width": 768, "height": 1024 }, { "width": 1440, "height": 1000 } ], "keyboardPath": true, "reducedMotion": true, "paidApiDefault": false, "teachingInstrument": true, "url": "https://glyphd.com/demos/d22-completion-gradient-protocol" } ], "notes": [ { "id": "n01-glyph-tokens", "number": "N01", "title": "Glyph Tokens", "subtitle": "Typed semantic carriers between natural language and governed operations", "state": "SPECIFIED", "wordCount": 332, "url": "https://glyphd.com/notes/n01-glyph-tokens" }, { "id": "n02-prompt-and-evidence-capsules", "number": "N02", "title": "PromptCapsules and EvidenceCapsules", "subtitle": "Bounded, digest-addressed context for model operation", "state": "SPECIFIED", "wordCount": 284, "url": "https://glyphd.com/notes/n02-prompt-and-evidence-capsules" }, { "id": "n03-identity-taxonomy", "number": "N03", "title": "Identity Is Not One Hash", "subtitle": "Exact, logical, semantic, contextual, representation, spatial, and receipt identities", "state": "VERIFIED_MECHANISM", "wordCount": 266, "url": "https://glyphd.com/notes/n03-identity-taxonomy" }, { "id": "n04-gantry-capability-leases", "number": "N04", "title": "Gantry and Capability Leases", "subtitle": "Integration and authority firewalls for external tools, models, devices, and agents", "state": "SPECIFIED", "wordCount": 203, "url": "https://glyphd.com/notes/n04-gantry-capability-leases" }, { "id": "n05-work-return-verification-acceptance", "number": "N05", "title": "Work, Return, Verification, Acceptance", "subtitle": "Why completion is a sequence of distinct durable events", "state": "VERIFIED_MECHANISM", "wordCount": 195, "url": "https://glyphd.com/notes/n05-work-return-verification-acceptance" }, { "id": "n06-polyview", "number": "N06", "title": "PolyView", "subtitle": "Many synchronized views over one governed state", "state": "SPECIFIED", "wordCount": 198, "url": "https://glyphd.com/notes/n06-polyview" }, { "id": "n07-surface-mind-pocket", "number": "N07", "title": "SurfaceMind Pocket", "subtitle": "A private compact model operating verified thinking surfaces on a phone", "state": "SPECIFIED", "wordCount": 213, "url": "https://glyphd.com/notes/n07-surface-mind-pocket" }, { "id": "n08-prefix-cache-layout", "number": "N08", "title": "Cache-Aware Prompt Layout", "subtitle": "Stable prefixes, bounded evidence tails, and model-specific invalidation", "state": "SPECIFIED", "wordCount": 190, "url": "https://glyphd.com/notes/n08-prefix-cache-layout" }, { "id": "n09-benchmark-receipts", "number": "N09", "title": "Benchmark Receipts", "subtitle": "Reproducible evidence, dependency-adjusted accounting, and honest non-results", "state": "VERIFIED_MECHANISM", "wordCount": 181, "url": "https://glyphd.com/notes/n09-benchmark-receipts" }, { "id": "n10-fold2-conformance", "number": "N10", "title": "fold/2 Conformance", "subtitle": "Deterministic serialization, bounded decoding, and fail-closed reconstruction", "state": "SPECIFIED", "wordCount": 185, "url": "https://glyphd.com/notes/n10-fold2-conformance" }, { "id": "n11-video-continuity-lineage", "number": "N11", "title": "Video Continuity, Canon, and Branch Lineage", "subtitle": "Persistent narrative objects across shots, edits, generations, and community canon", "state": "SPECIFIED", "wordCount": 202, "url": "https://glyphd.com/notes/n11-video-continuity-lineage" }, { "id": "n12-release-and-route", "number": "N12", "title": "Release & Route", "subtitle": "A voice transition from immutable capture to inspectable project state", "state": "IMPLEMENTED", "wordCount": 167, "url": "https://glyphd.com/notes/n12-release-and-route" }, { "id": "n13-workpage-plan-renderer", "number": "N13", "title": "WorkpagePlan and Renderer Ownership", "subtitle": "Why the model proposes structure while the deterministic renderer owns the page", "state": "SPECIFIED", "wordCount": 171, "url": "https://glyphd.com/notes/n13-workpage-plan-renderer" }, { "id": "n14-production-envelopes", "number": "N14", "title": "Production Envelopes", "subtitle": "Compile configuration, references, locks, cost, and review before execution", "state": "IMPLEMENTED", "wordCount": 177, "url": "https://glyphd.com/notes/n14-production-envelopes" }, { "id": "n15-station-contract", "number": "N15", "title": "Station Contracts", "subtitle": "Provider-independent execution capabilities that return evidence instead of owning projects", "state": "SPECIFIED", "wordCount": 187, "url": "https://glyphd.com/notes/n15-station-contract" }, { "id": "n16-two-note-proof", "number": "N16", "title": "The Two-Note Proof", "subtitle": "Current state, candidate state, and the rule that no PASS exists without evidence", "state": "VERIFIED_MECHANISM", "wordCount": 174, "url": "https://glyphd.com/notes/n16-two-note-proof" }, { "id": "n17-spark-dex-manifestation-runtime", "number": "N17", "title": "Spark-Dex: A Manifestation Sidecar for IDE Agents", "subtitle": "A small public specification for turning generated completion language into an inspectable state machine", "state": "IMPLEMENTED", "wordCount": null, "url": "https://glyphd.com/notes/n17-spark-dex-manifestation-runtime" }, { "id": "n18-completion-gradient-protocol", "number": "N18", "title": "The Completion Gradient Protocol", "subtitle": "A staged multi-intelligence method for moving a remembered project from almost specified to human-accepted", "state": "IMPLEMENTED", "wordCount": null, "url": "https://glyphd.com/notes/n18-completion-gradient-protocol" } ] }